Of course using the tool :)
Yes, it is just disabled. Lemmy Federate supports every threadiverse software and Piefed is one of them.
Currently Piefed communities can be followed by Lemmy instances but not the other way around.
In general, every fediverse software that support FEP-1b12 and can receive Lemmy-like PM’s can register to Lemmy Federate.
/cc @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]
My instance has 82GB of DB size. It is almost two years old. I think you're overestimating.
If you update your settings, all entries will be reset. Just click Save button in the management page.
I didn’t want to manipulate counts. If we had 500 instances registered, that would be problem.
Currently it doesn’t re-subscribe because it’s kind of edge case. It would also be fixed by increasing count to 2. I’m resetting the database every 1-2 months too.
This seems more like a Lemmy issue. However, to fix this issue, we can unsubscribe after 2 users follows instead of 1 🤔
I think open discovery algorithms are the way. We are against algos but sorting by like similarity would be beneficial.
What are you guys thinking? @[email protected] @[email protected] Are you optimistic about this or fuck any algorithms?
That is interesting. You haven’t blocked visibility of endorsements either. I’ll check it.
Is server load of posts/communities just not an issue? Questions about lemmy-federate from a skeptic
I reset statuses every few months for a re-check. Other than that, there’s no mechanism specifically for this case.
Interesting but potentially useful feature. I'll have to think about where to squeeze it in :)
Donationware: you must donate to use it. Not like regular optional donates.
cross-posted from: https://lemy.lol/post/19638968
I would like to introduce you to the tool I have developed in last 2 days.
As you know, when you create a new community on Lemmy, it is initially only available to your instance until users in other instances follows too. To fix this, this tool automatically follows the community from remote instances.
I have previously published a similar but simpler version at boost.lemy.lol and now I remade it because I didn't like some of its features. This time, instance admins will be able to strictly choose which instances they will allow or not. I'm open to your suggestions about different settings.
Please ask your instance admin to add their instance to this tool. To add it as an admin, all you have to do is log in and activate it from the settings.
Here's some tasks I'll implement in the future: https://github.com/ismailkarsli/lemmy-federate/issues
I would like to introduce you to the tool I have developed in last 2 days.
As you know, when you create a new community on Lemmy, it is initially only available to your instance until users in other instances follows too. To fix this, this tool automatically follows the community from remote instances.
I have previously published a similar but simpler version at boost.lemy.lol and now I remade it because I didn't like some of its features. This time, instance admins will be able to strictly choose which instances they will allow or not. I'm open to your suggestions about different settings.
Please ask your instance admin to add their instance to this tool. To add it as an admin, all you have to do is log in and activate it from the settings.
https://github.com/ismailkarsli/lemmy-federate
I noticed this instance in the All tab. It has 5 users in total but also has around 35k posts. It has posts specifically about Jesus, Christianity and a little bit of Covid.
In general, I defederate harmful instances (full-bot, CSAM, spam-infected etc.) immediately while keeping the ones people may not like but not that harmful like lemmygrad, hexbear to their own choice.
What I want to ask here is, should we defederate from this instance as whole or leave it to the users? Like are we have any benefit from this instance?
If Lemmy had a feature like default blocklist, I'm sure I would add this one there. The community that bothers me the most is: [email protected]
IIRC Lemmy and Mastodon PMs are different and incompatible. If you can receive PMs from Lemmy users then you should be able to receive auth codes. Currently @[email protected] is adding both Lemmy and Mastodon PMs here: https://github.com/ismailkarsli/lemmy-federate/pull/33
Also software other than Lemmy and Mbin needs to add ‘roleName: Administrator’ to their user webfinger requests. This is because ActivityPub doesn’t have a standard way to expose user roles.
I’m thinking of adding another ways of verifying like DNS based verification but still not sure. Any recommendations are welcome :)