No, I’m saying that as the only party to be anti genocide, if Australians cared about it as an issue, their votes would have increased, not decreased.
hitmyspot
joined 2 years ago
On a GendARM
This is a step towards indicating they might, or at least remove their favoured trade,
It becomes harder not to sanction Israel if the reason for the deal break is crimes against humanity.
Yes, especially tricking kids into surgery, despite all the research saying transgender surgery is less regretted than many successful cancer surgeries. And despite the fact that usually gender affirming care for kids is puberty blockers to allow them to make a firm decision when they are older. In fact, to help prevent the fact that kids are more suspceptible to persuasion and confusion.
Which is exactly why they should all be coming out against it. Take genocide money out of politics. Just like trump, with all republicans, the pressure to follow the singular narrative disappears when they all work together. It’s the point of having a party. Work together for the party good, not whomever lords over the party.
My Donald’s and the like? Shorter shifts when younger.
And likewise, you don't get to decide how they decide to help.
If you follow any federated instance, prepare to hear more than one view. That's the point.
Don't cry eugenics and then belittle everyone you disagree with as having an invalid opinion. Giving food and water to homeless people is not eugenics by any stretch of the imagination.
It can also be a recognition that most people who end up homeless end up that way due to addiction or mental health issues. Some people think if you’re homeless and want a little escape, it’s your decision. Others think they would prefer to help without feeding an addiction. Neither are doin the wrong thing, but doing the right thing in their own way.
Criticising people for helping others, as they see fit, that’s a bit weird at best, nasty at worst.
view more: next ›
They rejected the other candidates and now have nobody, so they are back at square one. It’s no worse for them as it would be for a person, but they have systematised it and are used to the upper hand. In the case of rejection, they lose their system and the upper hand.