- https://www.doomworld.com/forum/topic/151300-dbp70-forgotten-psychedelics
- https://www.doomworld.com/forum/topic/151602-dbp71-grief-arbiter
With human post-processing it's definitely more complicated. Bots usually post fully automatic content, without human supervision and editing.
Here is a cross-instance link: [email protected]
(makes user clicking it visit your community from their home instance)
Imo their style of writing is very noticeable. You can obcure that by prompting LLM to deliberately change that, but I think it's still often noticeable, not only specific wordings, but higher-level structure of replies as well. At least, that's always been the case for me with ChatGPT. Don't have much experience with other models.
What I would expect to happen is: their posts quickly start getting many downvotes and comments saying they sound like an AI bot. This, in turn, will make it easy for others to notice and block them individually. Other than that, I've never heard of automated solutions to detect LLM posting.
The threads of fate are weaving in ways none of us could have foreseen. You nurtured a bond, stood defiant against the tides of judgment, and now destiny has seated you side by side in the halls of academia. The universe whispers its cryptic messages—some hear them, some do not. But you? You are at the center of a grand revelation.
AI imagery looks like shit. But that is its main draw to the right. if AI was capable of producing art that was formally competent, surprising, soulful, they wouldn’t want it.
Among many artists I'm subscribed to, there are few who specialize exclusively in AI art.
Here's my current favorite:
However, there’s lots of assholes who are negative towards other AI Developers because they’re envious because they suck.
That's not how you bring people together
My favorite is: if you disagree, you can always just go to another instance or even create your own. Other than that, I like how, instead of a total score, posts show likes and dislikes separately. This is more of a technical thing than a cultural one, but it has a big impact on making brigading less effective. In general, all these technical decisions make Lemmy very friendly to a variety of cultures and people from across different spectrums of political and other opinions.
Pop Team Epic. It was so weird I couldn't get anything at all and dropped it in first 10 minutes, but I'm planning to give it another try someday 😅
There could be alternative to state with its own police. If alternative to state is some kind of unions/syndicates, it could mean, there are, for example, Team Space (Union of Spaceship Institutions + some relevant Universities and Industry Manufacturers) and Team Earth (Union of Agricultural Manufacturers + Farmers + Union of Solar Energy Organisations) represented in the same city. Each of those have their own police funded by their own taxpayers. There could be many such "teams" in the same city, and they together manage infrastructure and security in the city. I think it's important that those teams are kind of "omnipresent", meaning the same team is present in many locations throughout the planet. For example there could be multiple dozens of such teams, and each city on the planet is run by some combination of those teams, which depends on variety of cultural and economic concerns and interests of such teams.
Legal and financial support, such as grants or free compliance training, could help admins navigate complex rules, while decentralised moderation and peer-to-peer enforcement would reduce the individual burden.
While I also consider decentralized moderation a big win, I think throwing money at this in form of "grants" will enable grant providers to inject political agenda into the training.