fwygon

The change in EULA was the hint; I have not; and will not be buying any Switch 2 games, consoles or related merchandise. Nor will I be paying any further into my Switch beyond NSO as I have or buying any games for the Switch that are not explicitly on a physical cart.

I don't buy games often anyways and would rather support Pocketpair and Palworld and Valve. So that's where my discretionary spend and gift requests will go henceforth.

In general Nintendo is having it's villainous arc; and I don't believe they will survive it...given that they've run out or demoted their creatives and visionaries to workers. Nintendo is dead; what's left is a greedy and soulless shell that behaves more like a gang or mafia. Given their History; that doesn't surprise me.

This seems like a potentially clever defense against scrapers...which probably spoof the referrer field to be the base domain anyways.

I also think it's important to point out separately that this software can be modified down into an easy to use software package that allows one to input relevant taxable financial data into it; and then when it comes time to file your taxes; you print out a long report; take it to your tax professional, who is now easily able to read that report, and use the information to appropriately file taxes.

Heck; that report might even make it drop dead simple to fill out your own tax forms; should you decide that's what you'd like to do; and you could feed the software the relevant tax forms in and it would fill them out to the best of it's ability using the data provided to it.

I don't see the problem. This can be forked, enhanced, updated, and modified and that version released with an appropriate copyleft license.

Sure; some companies will do the same with utterly horrific copyright licenses. That's fine; as it's in the public domain. We just need some group to work to provide an appropriate copyleft licensed version.

Ideally we should be getting on this fast; but we all know FOSS work isn't going to be fast if it's done by volunteers. Some funds might need raising.

In essence; CC0 is an ultimate copyleft license; as it does not even preclude the use of copyrighting improvements on variant works.

It doesn't have to be sinister to be wrong, or, to violate the ethos standards that the FOSS community at large is supposed to stand for.

When it's explained simply; it seems to make more sense to emotive thinking.

An example:

"[Manufacturer] is [telling you that/acting like] you cannot choose apps outside of their [store/collection/catalog]; even if you, as an adult, would trust that app or need it to save your own sanity, health or life."

When I tell an Apple user that; they suck their teeth and try to make [noises/excuses] but in the end they do relent and admit that does suck. Not only can they not refute it logically, they cannot refute it emotionally.

When I show them how I've riced out the experience of my Android Smartphone and how I can use my phone rapidly without encumbrance because I have everything at my fingertips in a workflow that comes native to me....they get jealous!

Sadly where I lose them, is where I tell them all the work I put in to achieve it. I have to break the news to them that going to the store and buying a phone with freedoms just like mine isn't possible. Perhaps that's where we need to attack these things.

Basically; we need to make freedom look sexy. There will invariably be things we can do with our freed devices and software systems that they cannot hope to achieve. We have to endeavor to make that difference as pronounced and noticeable as possible. When we do; that's when FLOSS communities swell and grow. When Linux got good at gaming with Proton; the numbers swelled. Linux became "sexy" because it could game. If we give users something they can have over their peers who don't seek freedom respecting software, they will flock to it in droves...and the companies will be driven into the poorhouse for failing to meet the user demands.

When comparing it to X11; it absolutely isn't. That isn't me being unfair; just objectively comparing the two to each other. Literally nothing else exists that are quite like X11 and Wayland...so it makes sense to grade one against the other.

That isn't saying it does not work as well or even better than X11 does; it just hasn't existed for long enough yet to be nearly as widely adopted as X11 is. Gnome's decision to adopt a Wayland only stance is fairly new and I'm waiting to see how that goes for them. With luck it will go well and increase the adoption of Wayland. I'm aware that plenty of Distros do include Wayland; and plenty have taken the plunge similar to Gnome; which is why they probably felt it was wise to follow suit, after observing Wayland succeeding in those Distros fairly well.

I don't really have a horse in the argument per-se; I think both X11 and Wayland are both great; if you're using them like the developers intended you to use them.

I do think the video makes a pretty good point about how people who attack others for continuing X11 is very much violating the ethos of FOSS communities in general; and I have no doubts that if the claims made in the video are true; I think folks like Stallman would be kind of upset with people behaving that way because it only harms the FOSS community as a whole.

You may not agree with people who want to use X11 for their very niche use cases. That's fine. But I do question any motives behind any kind of behavior that is not only ceasing all development on X11, but actively blocking and sabotaging others who want to work on X11 from doing so.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electroconvulsive_therapy#History

Hell. To. The. No.

This is no different than the electroshock 'therapies' that were pioneered from 1930 and onward through the 1990s used to treat people who were "Mentally ill". This is based in medical quackery and this is highly problematic that it once again is being suggested.

Nintendo is clearly hiding something; they clearly are highly afraid of critical reviews and this is clearly a strategy that is not unlike what Nvidia, led by Jensen Huang, does.

What they are hiding will remain to be seen. I'm sure that the bad reviews will not go away...only be delayed by a week or so.

If you are wise; you will avoid buying the Switch 2 for at least a month. If you can't wait a month to see what Nintendo is hiding; just be advised; you bought into it blind and have no right to complain about the bad reviews later, nor should you take it personally when people start talking poorly about the Switch 2.

In a perfectly reasonable, civilized and rational world; this would be seen as an additional feature in "Bad taste".

There is no rational reason for the company to permit any kind of detailed filtering; the longer you're swiping through photos, the longer you use the app and the chance that you potentially give them money for services remains.

There is no rational reason to discriminate against people based on their height either. While it's quite natural to have preferences, generally speaking, you know when you find someone attractive. I don't think I've ever heard of someone genuinely only attracted to specifically only tall or short people; there's usually something else there behind the reason. That reason could be any number of things from feelings to experiences and more.

Attraction, much like people, is a complicated and not so straightforward thing. It's reason for being isn't based on rationality always, we don't always size up our mates the way a computer would. In general it's oftentimes emotional, and attractiveness can be something that happens when someone manages to emotionally convey an appearance or vibe that matches something the one feeling the attraction might be looking for.