fullsquare

There is evidence to suggest that artificial intelligence is advancing exponentially

yawn

assuming that nuclear nonproliferation is gonna hold up indefinitely for any reason is some real fukuyama's end of history shit

let alone "because it's Rational™ thing to do", it's only in rational interest of already-nuclear states to keep things this way. couple of states that could make a good point for having nuclear arsenal and having capability to manufacture it are effectively dissuaded from this by american diplomacy (mostly nuclear umbrella for allies and sanctions or fucking with their facilities for enemies). with demented pedo in chief and his idiot underlings trying their hardest to undo this all, i really wouldn't be surprised if, say, south korea decides to get nuclear

thoughts and prayers if you're lucky, best that they can do now is vagueposting

either they used that or whatever was shot down looked completely different

modern radar can measure speed, size, altitude of target and count turbine blades, allowing to figure out what it is. well, rotational speed of propeller in this case but logic is the same

whatever was shot down was shot by fighter jets, not gbad

the explanation that was given at the time was that drones that were assessed as armed were shot down near border (like the one that blew off roof - it was strictly speaking debris after shootdown) but decoys were allowed to crash on their own

he was a propagandist

it's a guess of what can be abstracted away and what has to remain. i'd just add that evolutionarily, peptide signalling is older than synapses so these, or something that works like these, probably can't be just left out of the picture, and there's a couple of processes that seem important that depend on them (you can live normal life while packed full of naloxone, which blocks activity of opioid peptides, but this probably won't work with, say, orexin which is important for sleep/wake cycle)

huh i honestly had no idea, and i guessed he was very replaceable in rw propaganda machine. i heard somewhere that shapiro was also supposed to be there

at minimum this requires additionally keeping position of neurons, modelling concentration of any neurotransmitters and their diffusion (taking into account shape of cells around) and their degradation products, some of which are active on their own. whatever set of interactions might be between neurons, it'll probably make it changing with time and probably not sparse (information exchange isn't just packaged neatly within synapses)

i didn't even thought he was relevant anymore since 2020, he was like 2017 era chud debatelord who relied entirely on gotchas. he did toe the party line tho, so maybe some divergent rightwinger didn't like what he was doing for whatever reason. maybe it was situation like with trump shooter, probable republican that didn't particularly like epstein link, or whatever else cause there might be involved