fragmentcity

Replacement is just one application. What about generating entire performances? Can't do it yet, but the data will be there when they figure it out.

Most of you upvoting this would need to go to Wikipedia before you could have a remotely intelligent conversation about revolutionary violence.

I have no problem saying that if I woke up in a country where political change was brought about by killing elected officials, I'd leave. Fuck that noise and fuck political murder.

The data is still going to be there when there's cost effective AI tech...

Everyone is having a bad time, in different ways. It's easy to notice things you personally relate to, and equally easy to overlook the many, many things that don't resonate with you.

~~my wife left her~~ I carefully posed ~~my wife's~~ a purse on a chair

• Dump on tl;drs
• Subject your readers to a minimally-edited 4000 word rant

You get to pick one.

Malicious custom emoji contained scripts that sent session cookies to the attackers.

And here's where the mods turn to the camera with roguish smirks, because they weren't necessarily bluffing.

You know, I'd love to read things that are written to be read, not something that reads like the storyboard to PCG's video content for this item.

My cousin or my best friend or myself who might be gay or lesbian, any store they walk in they might get discriminated against because the Supreme Court says it’s OK

This is irresponsibly wrong, and I'm really surprised this is what you hear on a national network.

Breaking it down:

• The Supreme Court found that a Colorado law would violate the First Amendment as it's currently written
• The law says that businesses cannot deny any service to members of a protected class based on their membership in that class
• The business owner in question offers services that involve creating expressive works (protected by 1A)
• The Court found that Colorado cannot prohibit the owner from refusing to create an expressive work with a message they disagree with.

Here's what the Court did NOT find:

• Business can deny service to any person because they're LGBTQA.
  • This was not the question before the court, and in fact the business owner in this case stipulated that she already does not deny service to anyone based on their membership in a protected group.
• Businesses can refuse to create an expressive work for any person because they're LGBTQA
  • It's not the fact that the person is gay, but that the message of the requested work is objectionable to the owner. Colorado cannot compel expression, per the Constitution.

And yet Van Jones is out here embarrassing himself and misinforming people who are LOOKING for a reason to be angry. Be angry about the facts, if you must be angry about anything.

Nope sorry, Youtube gets punished for bad ad practices. You don't get to pretend that the content creator is the victim of the ad-blocking user when YT controls the platform.

Americans who understand the first amendment will tell you that freedom of association is inseparable from freedom of expression. The government (plus its agents) is the only entity constrained by the First Amendment. Everyone else benefits from it, including certain instance owners who don't want to associate with certain others.

That is certainly one perspective.