You can't really host your own AWS, You can self-host various amalgamations of services that imitate some of the features of AWS, but you can't really self-host your own AWS by any stretch of the imagination.
And if you're thinking with something like localstack, that's not what it's for, and it has huge gaps that make it unfit for live deployment (It is after all meant for test and local environments)
No, most definitely not, and it.... Sucks.
I just wanna sit down and play Minecraft or something again.
Or peach 🍑 or splash 💦
Kind of dumb really, I hate censorship.
Perfect opportunity for them. Even worse are organized hate groups like KKK and friends
The hard part is in the scripting, the retries, the back off, automation, queuing and queue management...etc
At that point I'm implementing my own bootleg TubeArchivist 😅
Oh it's definitely an easy to read DB. But that's still beyond the point IMHO.
If you can't reconstruct the state of your files without 3rd party software to interpret them, then they are not in an archive format.
One should be able to browse their data using OS native tools on an offline device push comes to shove.
2FA I'm sure.
The attitude here is the following (I am neither enforcing, nor criticize this):
When random thugs come to your door to kidnap you and/or your family, you defend yourself, and your family. With any force available to you. ICE are acting like these thugs, often not even in uniform, they are brown coats.
You didn't necessarily know who it is or what there intentions are.
And rule NUMBER 1 of being taken, is NEVER ALLOW YOURSELF TO BE TAKEN TO A SECONDARY LOCATION. Anything they would be willing to do to you now, they would be willing to do 10x once you're in a place they feel safe.
Anyways, the concept being that if it's dangerous for brown coats to "do their job" and kidnap people, they're less inclined to. And citizens have a right to defend their rights and their liberties.
Sounds like American healthcare to me.
You either cope, and probably cause irreparable hard to yourself, or you go to the clinic or ER and get labeled a drug seeker.
I mean at this point you're just being intentionally obtuse no? You are correct of course, volatile memory if you consider it from a system point of view would be pretty asinine to try and store.
However, we're not really looking at this from a system's view are we? Clearly you ignored all the other examples I provided just to latch on to the memory argument. There are many other ways that this data could be stored in a transient fashion.
I mean, it's more complicated than that.
Of course, data is persisted somewhere, in a transient fashion, for the purpose of computation. Especially when using event based or asynchronous architectures.
And then promptly deleted or otherwise garbage collected in some manner (either actively or passively, usually passively). It could be in transitory memory, or it could be on high speed SSDs during any number of steps.
It's also extremely common for data storage to happen on a caching layer level and not violate requirements that data not be retained since those caches are transitive. Let's not mention the reduced rate "bulk" non-syncronous APIs, Which will use idle, cheap, computational power to do work in a non-guaranteed amount of time. Which require some level of storage until the data can be processed.
A court order forcing them to start storing this data is a problem. It doesn't mean they already had it stored in an archival format somewhere, it means they now have to store it somewhere for long term retention.
Same, having the freedom to ride my bike wherever I could and meet and play with other kids was crucial to my social and personal development.
The fact that you need a permit is already a violation of the right of assembly IMHO.