https://xcancel.com/BillMelugin_/status/1933222907398008912 (video)

snippet

This idea that the Israeli military isn't involved is bullshit. They're very much involved. They have offices in our compounds. We share our radio communications with them. The higher-ups claim the Israeli military is not involved, but it feels like they’re the man behind the curtain. Sure, they’re not on-site with us, but their snipers and tanks are just hundreds of meters away. You can hear them shooting all day.

One episode sticks with me. We were monitoring an empty site all day; sometime after dark, dozens of flatbed trucks finally brought aid. The Israeli military soon radioed in that 200 to 300 civilians a couple of kilometers (less than two miles) north were approaching. We then observed an Israeli drone go out there. Shortly thereafter, that area started getting lit up with artillery.

https://archive.is/d4A1V

News as of 6pm Jerusalem time (2 hours ago): Thiago Ávila and Rima Hassan are now held in solitary confinement under punitive and inhumane conditions:

Thiago was placed in isolation in Ayalon Prison due to his ongoing hunger and thirst strike, which he began two days ago.

Rima Hassan was placed in isolation under inhumane conditions in Neve Tirza Prison after writing “Free Palestine” on a wall in Givon Prison.

EDIT: We have just been informed that Rima has been moved from solitary back to Givon. Thiago remains in solitary.

https://xcancel.com/GazaFFlotilla/status/1932838341822882042#m

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2025/6/11/live-israel-kills-dozens-of-palestinian-aid-seekers-in-central-gaza?update=3768770

https://xcancel.com/DropSiteNews/status/1932840445530251290#m

Israeli authorities were abusive toward passengers of the humanitarian aid boat intercepted on its way to Gaza, which had on board Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg, a French doctor has alleged.

Baptiste André, who was on the boat, told reporters upon his return to France that while there were no acts of physical violence, he witnessed Israeli border agents mock and deliberately deprive passengers of sleep, in particular Thunberg.

As soon as someone fell asleep, agents would turn up the music and dance, André claimed.

Detainees also had difficulty accessing food and water, he said.

https://archive.is/sJUMB (politico eu)

https://xcancel.com/GazaFFlotilla/status/1932778456309223714#m

https://xcancel.com/AJEnglish/status/1932358323463987675#m

https://archive.is/XQmVO << US government justice gov statement

editted the title to clarify that this happened in the US.

Each of the volunteers was given two options: sign documents consenting to deportation, or remain in detention and appear before a tribunal. The FFC had encouraged some volunteers, if given the option, to agree to expedited deportation in order to restore access to communication—including the ability to speak freely and advocate for their fellow participants.

1. Baptiste Andre (France) – Deported
2. Greta Thunberg (Sweden) – Deported
3. Sergio Toribio (Spain) – Deported
4. Suayb Ordu (Turkey) – Detained
5. Mark van Rennes (The Netherlands) – Detained
6. Pascal Maurieras (France) – Detained
7. Reva Viard (France) – Detained
8. Rima Hassan (France) – Detained
9. Thiago Avila (Brazil) – Detained
10. Yanis Mhamdi (France) – Detained
11. Yasemin Acar (Germany) – Detained
12. Omar Faiad (France) – Deported

https://freedomflotilla.org/2025/06/10/our-deported-eight-detained-israel-holds-madleen-group-illegally/

https://archive.is/SgdJn (freedomflotilla)

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/6/10/israel-launches-deportation-of-gaza-bound-madleen-activists

Entry into U.S. Is Not Matter of Our Interest: International Affairs Analyst

Pyongyang, June 10 (KCNA) -- Kim Myong Chol, an international affairs analyst of the DPRK, issued the following article titled "Entry into the U.S. is not a matter of our interest" on June 9:

Recently, the U.S. announced a measure to designate the peoples of 19 countries as the subjects of ban to entry into the U.S. under the pretext of "threat" to its national security.

The arrogant acts of the U.S., which is self-righteous, exclusive and racist, are now faced with strong denunciation and rejection of the international community.

Of course, it is a matter belonging to the sphere of sovereign rights of a relevant country to restrict and control the entry of foreigners.

Nevertheless, the above-said measure taken by the U.S. is incurring a censure of the international community because it is used as a malicious political tool for discriminating and pressurizing other countries.

Great irony is that there is strange interpretation that the Democratic People's Republic of Korea was not included in the subjects of the U.S. ban on entry and this measure may reflect the U.S. administration's carrot stand towards the DPRK to open the door to the resumption of dialogue between the two countries.

This cannot be interpreted otherwise than one-sided judgment not knowing well the past and present relations between the DPRK and the U.S.

In 2017, the first term of office, the present U.S. administration included the DPRK in the list of countries subject to entry ban to the U.S. for the unjust reason that it refused to cooperate with the U.S. government and did not meet the demand for sharing information, and maintained it throughout its ruling.

This year when the second term of office began, the U.S. re-designated the DPRK as an "uncooperative state in combating terrorism" and extended again the effect of the measure for totally banning the U.S. citizens' trip to the DPRK.

The reason why the U.S. does not include the DPRK in the list can be explained only by the U.S., whether it is purely for technical reason or for political purpose.

But one obvious fact is that we are not interested in the least in the matter of entry into the U.S.

Even if the present U.S. administration has not placed the DPRK intentionally on the list of countries subject to entry ban, the DPRK is not interested in it and has no reason to be glad.

The U.S., which is the most hostile country to the DPRK and where xenophobia and racial discrimination have been established as a social climate and all sorts of social evils flood, can never be welcomed as the destination of the DPRK citizens' trip.

Shortly ago, the vice-president, the second-ranking person of the present U.S. administration, denounced a U.S. university for lacking "ideological diversity" and made absurd sophism about the political system of the DPRK. This is another typical example why the DPRK has repugnance for the U.S.

If the present U.S. administration thinks that the DPRK will accept the allowing of the entry into the U.S. as a "gift" which it neither thinks nor wants, it is miscalculation.

It is not the matter of the DPRK's concern that the U.S. unilaterally makes illegal regulations outside and places the DPRK in them or not. I think that the Democratic People's Republic of Korea will, in the future, too, not welcome the entry of Americans into it.

This is a just and legitimate exercise of sovereign rights to defend the state and social system and the welfare of the people from all hostile threats of the U.S. and is quite different from the U.S. prejudiced prohibition measure on entry with malicious intention.

The DPRK will not evaluate the U.S. actions on the basis of someone's hopeful observations or subjective interpretation. It will face the U.S. on the basis of the reality and by relying on its own independent judgment. -0-
www.kcna.kp (2025.06.10.)

http://kcna.kp/en/article/q/bc4fd4528da8471979b7f7f951025135.kcmsf

https://archive.is/itHZt (kcna)