db0

The victim blaming with assumed narratives no less, is astounding.

We require a valid email for registration as an anti-spam measure, but you can garble the email afterwards.

A single blurry still doesn't pose a convincing argument that he was or wasn't pointing the weapon towards the crowds.

We don't go around making plausible reasons and then asking the victim to prove them wrong. Maybe the killers are lying to cover their ass?

Facts on the ground is: Arturo didn't shoot anyone, had a right to carry, a bystander was killed by the "good guys" and Arturo was shot himself. Nothing in all of this proves that Arturo was a danger to anyone.

Maybe he panicked? Maybe he didn't want to hit bystanders. None of us have been shot before, but from all I know, all rational thought easily goes out the window.

Israel’s element of surprise was enhanced by Iranian officials’ apparent assumption that Israel wouldn’t attack while talks over its rapidly advancing nuclear program were ongoing with the U.S.

Relevant

That smells like a "he's coming right for us" bullshit report.

I had something similar in Germany.

Yes, unfortunately this is why the software itself enforces such rigid hierarchies.

posting anti-tankie and anti-electoralism stuff in an Anarchism comm is one of the easiest way to generate infinite salt.

Just ask them yourself mate https://slrpnk.net/post/23329676

Way I understand it, They didn't want to give flyers to outsiders for "come to our march /org /whatever" and be all blurred/black faces

So, i've seen this proposed, and i don't see why blurring or blacking wouldn't work. Safer, too.

The person who wanted to do this, wanted to make a poster that doesn't look scary to outsiders, by having blurred or blackened faces.

And chill with the condescension