I use those when writing literature, but because in Spanish it is what we use for dialogs.
daniskarma
joined 1 year ago
I never got what's the deal with that. Sincerely. If there's a break up, what's the difference doing it by text, phone or in person.
My gut says me that people may prefer in person because they saw a better chance of avoid the breakup that way, but I'm not sure.
Other than that if it's over it's over, I don't see the media in which the message is deliver. For all I care as if it's via smoke signals.
I wonder if it would be easy to do a cut of the movie so that's what happens.
They can and they will just lobby commission or EU Parliament if needed.
Do you have a proper robots.txt file?
Do they do weird things like invalid url, invalid post tries? Weird user agents?
Millions of times by the same ip sound much more like vulnerability proving than crawler.
If that's the case fail to ban or crowdsec. Should be easy to set up a rule to ban an inhumane number of hits per second on certain resources.
How do you know it's "AI" scrappers?
I've have my server up before AI was a thing.
It's totally normal to get thousands of bot hits and to get scraped.
I use crowdsec to mitigate it. But you will always get bot hits.
You can also use a shorter version .clone();
Nah. Powertripping mods explain bans.
Even here on Lemmy you heard about unjustified bans all the time.
Histeria clickbait makes money. Extra points if some kind of agenda can be pushed so more people share.
I don't know who are these people. And they have achieved in record time that I never want to really heard them anymore.
Nah. That analogy does not work.
Piracy situation is more like you have made a cool statue and you charge people money for looking at your statue. Then someone comes, looks at your statue, and goes away without paying.
There's no thief, nothing was stolen at any point. The one how came looking without paying was probably never going to pay for an entrance, and the statue can me still be looked by anyone. Nothing is loss in the process, no harm is done. Some guy just looked at a statue without paying for it.
Many people don't care about it. Me included, for instance.
I would give the reason why but I don't know if anyone is truly interested in knowning.
I don't consider things being made by AI as something terrible. If the post is fine I upvote and comment like any other post. If the content is lazy, clickbaity or plain bad then it's bad. But if it's good I don't care that it was produced using some AI tool or other.
It's true that the fediverse it's still hostile towards AI conversation (this very comment have high possibilities to be drowned with downvotes) but I'm glad the general stance is changing little by little. I hope in a few years the hostility would be much more marginal, specially if the fediverse keeps growing and more people with more diverse opinions come in.
I like to talk about topics, seeing different opinions about it, and when everyone have the same opinion the discussion is not really interesting. With AI, it's something new that sparks a lot of though process about may topic. For instance the morality of it, or the limits, trying to find the gray areas between the black and the white. It can be very interesting, and I'm glad, little by little we can start talking about it.