cyrus

joined 1 year ago
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They should've just moved the other twitter domains too ๐Ÿซ 

[โ€“] [email protected] 88 points 1 year ago (11 children)

This is a deliberate decision to force people to turn off tracking protection.

No this is a hilarious fuckup where they forgot to move twitter.com, pbs.twimg.com and more off of the Twitter domains, so Firefox started blocking it because to Firefox it looks like Social Media trackers.

Mozilla already pushed a fix.

[โ€“] [email protected] 204 points 1 year ago (10 children)

This issue comes from the fact that even though the domain is now changed to x.com, it still tries to load content from twitter.com which Firefox thinks is social media tracking because it's coming from a different domain than the one you're on.

It's a hilarious and dumb oversight with this change.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah but logically speaking that's what EX looks fort, and chances are that it'll work (because why else would it be in the response?)

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, the entire point is that it is the client where Sliding-Sync is being developed and tested.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Open https://yourserver.example/.well-known/matrix/client and see if this part exists in it:

"org.matrix.msc3575.proxy": {
    "url": "https://slidingsync.lab.matrix.org"
}

if so, chances are it'll just work.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

FYI: xManager itself is Open-Source, Spotify obviously isn't.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I won't properly reply to this, I'm biased cuz a friend of mine works on this ๐Ÿฅด

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

That's just fine.

[โ€“] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

no I don't believe a damn word of what apple's gonna say on this, I just wanted to get the message out there that generally file deletion works by allowing data to be overwritten, so if the images are local this could very well just be that either it's showing data that hasn't been overwritten yet or it accidentally brought things out of the "recently deleted" depending on how long ago it was deleted.

[โ€“] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago (7 children)

no when I say "overwritten" I mean that the area is set as deleted in the filesystem and the next time something writes to that area the data that was there before is disregarded.

view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ