Arkenfox is not a fork FYI
cyrus
Hosting data yourself wouldn't be required, but it would become an option.
You'd have the option of leaving your identity on your home server, or a separate domain/website, or host your data and identity but use another instance to federate.
Though, designing UX for this will be an interesting challenge.
What exactly does Google have left that people like? Gmail?
Nope, not GMail either, even GMail has ads now.
If anything, installing GrapheneOS on a Pixel probably reduces the risk of something happening to your phone, that's kind of the point with having an Android distribution that maximizes security and privacy.
And because the installer is so simple that you just connect your phone, open a browser and hit three buttons, it's really unlikely that you'll accidentally brick your phone trying to install it.
yes but active usage doesnt mean it was not used?
If their criteria was "at least 1 person uses it at all, sometimes" then it would not have been removed 🤔
likely no maintenance effort at all.
The maintenance comes less from the code and more from making sure that every single menu added or changed in any way continues to behave correctly in three different sizes with themes and everything.
Arkenfox is simply a set of configuration you can (and should) apply yourself onto a clean Firefox installation.
A fork means taking the source code and modifying it directly, not providing an alternative configuration file.