ciferecaNinjo

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
 

If you need to report a story or “blow a whistle” on something, any ideas where to go?

I went to a couple news outlets (e.g. RTBF) and they have a security gatekeeper forcing people to make appointments. The email addresses are generally Gmail addresses -- WTF? They seem to think their vanity address hides the fact that they force sensitive info through a dodgy surveillance advertiser.

They push webforms that are CAPTCHA-encumbered. I don’t do CAPTCHAs.

Is there a media outlet where people can just walk-in, with no appointment, and expose a story without having to go through some shitty or insecure process?

 

I hope no one pays €50 for a new flip phone from Aldi considering there are hundreds of 2nd-hand feature phones every Sunday morning at Mabru for around ~€2—5, and occasionally new ones for €10. Seems crazy Aldi can fetch €50.

Folks should be boycotting Aldi anyway, in support for a free unoccupied Palestine.

 

The fixed fees for electricity and gas are taking a big leap (17.5%). Not sure what happened but this is likely nowhere near inflation indexes.

In my case the fixed annual fees will be 16% of the total annual bill (over 2 months worth of the total annual bill). This flat fee/consumption ratio encourages consumption. There’s a point where it actually makes sense to buy electricity and gas from a neighbor. And we may be crossing that point.

The injection rate is ~2.7 €c/kWh, compared to ~16.5 €c/kWh that you pay them for the same quantity of energy. The goal with this immense spread as well as the high fixed annual fees seems to be to push people off grid.

 

Starting with the open data EU directive:

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/NIM/?uri=CELEX%3A32019L1024

I went to "national transposition" on the sidebar, expanded Belgium, and I see lots of Wallonia-specific statutes. The Brussels specific laws would be interesting but what I fetched was not a complete body of current law. It was a long list of modifications of past law along the lines of “change this word… replace that word..”, etc.

Does anyone have a link to the full current open data law? Preferably in french because that works best for machine translation.

 

I was startled to find this gem in EU directive 2019/1024 Art.9 ¶1:

Where possible, Member States shall facilitate the cross-linguistic search for documents, in particular by enabling metadata aggregation at Union level.

Even if you neglect the “cross-linguistic” specification, merely making public documents searchable is a huge leap of progress in the EU. And I think all member states are currently breaking that law for the most part, as we are generally forced to rely on private sector ad surveillance garbage from Google and Bing to find most public sector docs.

Sure there are a few scattered search tools for some very specific collections of documents. But most public documents are not at all indexed in any publicly administered search tool.

Of course the “cross-linguistic” specification is quite interesting because document translations are sometimes performed but the result is often not shared and even more often not searchable. E.g., for some reason a university or institution in Belgium (possibly public sector) went to the effort of creating a good English version of a big piece of the Belgian Economic Code. I was lucky to stumble into it out in the wild. Per the directive (which is hopefully transposed into national law), someone who searches for that section of Belgian economic code should get a reference to the unofficial English version along with the French and Dutch versions. But they certainly do not because the national legal statutes search site is hard-coded for just French and Dutch.

This touches on a recent question I asked. If the EU were to obtain an English version of transposed directives, in principle they should be furnishing that to the public. There’s one snag here though: the open data directive seems to exclude the EU itself from Art.9.

 

I could not reach the site from Tor. The linked page is the archive.org cached version, which actually is open to all.

 

Belgian banks have gone to the Orwellian extremes of outright refusing cash deposits without proof of source, even for small amounts as low as €50! The war on cash (war on privacy) is in full swing in Belgium.

At the same time, German ATMs are not producing receipts. My understanding of EU law is that the ATM must print a receipt if there is a currency exchange on the ATM’s side of the transaction (please correct me if I’m wrong). But I see no EU law requiring ATMs to print receipts generally. Some ATMs in Germany don’t even have printers; no slot for dispensing receipts. By extension, I suppose such ATMs must not be capable of offering dynamic currency conversion (which is bizarre because that’s where the most profit is in the ATM business).

In any case, it seems a bit off that you can get cash from a German ATM, get denied a receipt (you don’t know in advance that a receipt will not be given), and then you cannot deposit that cash in Belgium due to their nannying.

Or can you? What if you write down the ATM machine’s number, location, time, date, and amount. Would a log of that information serve to document the source of the cash to legal standards?

 

Belgian banks have gone to the Orwellian extremes of outright refusing cash deposits without proof of source, even for small amounts as low as €50! The war on cash (war on privacy) is in full swing in Belgium.

At the same time, German ATMs are not producing receipts. My understanding of EU law is that the ATM must print a receipt if there is a currency exchange on the ATM’s side of the transaction (please correct me if I’m wrong). But I see no EU law requiring ATMs to print receipts generally. Some ATMs in Germany don’t even have printers; no slot for dispensing receipts. By extension, I suppose such ATMs must not be capable of offering dynamic currency conversion (which is bizarre because that’s where the most profit is in the ATM business).

In any case, it seems a bit off that you can get cash from a German ATM, get denied a receipt (you don’t know in advance that a receipt will not be given), and then you cannot deposit that cash in Belgium due to their nannying.

Or can you? What if you write down the ATM machine’s number, location, time, date, and amount. Would a log of that information serve to document the source of the cash to legal standards?

 

It should really be more than just a symbol. Everytime a cyclist is killed, the gov should take these actions:

  • increase all car costs across the board by 1% per dead cyclist. That is, cost of car registration, emissions tests, cost of public parking, license renewal fees, etc.
  • convert streetside parking to a cycling path.. one unplanned rework per death. Planned improvements don’t count.
  • cost of traffic fines increase by 1% per death.

That is what should happen.

 

I have seen this at least twice now.

(background: Instead of paying bPost the extortionate cost of €10 to deliver a letter and collect a signature, I personally deliver the letter and ask for a signature.)

Most recipients are honest and simply sign. But in at least 2 cases I have seen the recipient open the envelope and read the letter in front of me before deciding whether to sign. That’s off, no? These are not individuals. It’s businesses and agencies who I approach to make a signed delivery.

Since I am not bPost, the situation is murky and does not seem to be legally defined. So I can understand some hesitation with signing as some recipients are alienated by a non-bPost courier. In fact 3 or so businesses/agencies outright refuse to sign, effectively giving bPost a monopoly on recorded delivery.

At the same time, the entities that refuse to sign for non-bPost recorded deliveries will accept email from anyone, which has the same legal status as recorded delivery. (Indeed it’s a terrible idea to give a simple email that does not pass through a digital notary service that level of standard of evidence, but that’s another matter). Anyway, it amounts to another situation where analog/offline people get unequal adverse treatment.

 

A Turk was telling me about a peaceful demonstration he attended, in Turkey. He said police surrounded the protest. Then someone in plain clothes threw a stone at the police. One of the demonstrators noticed that the guy who threw the stone had handcuffs in his back pocket. IOW, a cop posing as a demonstrator threw a stone in order to justify the police tagging the protest as “violent” so they could shut it down.

So of course the question is, to what extent are bad actors on Tor actually boot lickers who are working to ruin Tor for everyone?

 

English translation, emphasis added:

A joint operation of the BTI Team 8 and the Local Research Centre of the Brussels Police Capitale-Ixelles allowed to put hands on several alleged bicycles stolen during a check following a situation deemed suspect. Thanks to this intervention, some of the owners have already been found, but several bicycles are still waiting to be claimed by their legitimate owners. In the announcement that was posted on Facebook and that you will find at the bottom of this article, you will see all the bikes found.

If you recognize one of these bikes or think it might be yours, the police invite you to contact them quickly. Each bike is individually referenced and can be identified with specific details provided by the owner during the contact.

To report that one of these bikes belongs to you, contact the police via private message on their dedicated page "Vancingflic" by mentioning the reference of the advertisement and the number of the bike concerned. In order to check your legitimacy as the owner, specific details will be requested, such as the serial number, photos or any other element to prove that the bike belongs to you.

To protect your bicycles, consider registering them in databases like mybike.brussels, a Brussels-based initiative to facilitate the identification of stolen bicycles. The recording is to mark your bike with a unique number linked to your personal details. In the event of flight, it simplifies the procedures to recover it.

A commune newsletter also recently wrote:

(English translation, emphasis added)

What about THEFT?

If theft of your bike took place without violence or direct contact and if you do not know the author of the facts, the complaint to the police can be made online (my.police.be) or in a police station (taking an appointment in advance via polbruno.be). The bicycles found are listed on a Facebook page, managed by the Brussels Region, the police and the CyCLO asbl (f MyBike. brussels Bikes found). If you recognize your bike, follow the instructions to know who to contact and how to get it back.

(original French)

QUE FAIRE EN CAS DE VOL ?

Si le vol de votre vélo a eu lieu sans violence ou contact direct et si vous ne connaissez pas l’auteur des faits, le dépôt de plainte à la police peut se faire en ligne (my.police.be) ou dans un commis- sariat (en prenant rendez-vous au préalable via polbruno.be). Les vélos retrouvés sont recen- sés sur une page Facebook, gérée par la Région bruxelloise, la police et l’asbl CyCLO (f MyBike. brussels Vélos retrouvés). Si vous reconnaissez votre vélo, suivez les instructions pour savoir qui contacter et comment le récupérer.

[–] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago

I don't know the Belgian case, but I think it's the same thing in many member states; the publishing of laws online is done by private for-profit companies, and comes with weird restrictions.

Belgium has an open data law obligating the state to make available to the public generally all information that the state has, with some reasonable restrictions w.r.t private info about individuals. Legal statutes themselves would obviously have to be openly accessible under that law. That law was even used to force publication of train routes and schedules. I’ve not read the law but I guess it’s likely sloppy about what constitutes “open”, because the state’s own website is access restricted (e.g. Tor IPs are blocked).

[–] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I’ve always appreciated your competence and diligence in setting a good example of responsible hosting without resorting to shitty technofeudal fiefdoms like Cloudflare. Nice to see you are standing your ground and not selling the users out (unlike lemmy world and many other boot licking hosts).

I must say there is a notable side-effect to this. Since mbin does not have a cross-posting feature, I have been cross-posting by creating a link post to my original post from other relevant magazines. Now all of those links are unreachable to outsiders. To outsiders, I polluted their magazine with access-restricted links.

I can think of only two workarounds:

  1. Make the original post on a publicly open forum, then link to that from other forums. This means the original post can never be on Fedia (which has the side-effect of reducing fedia publicity); and/or
  2. Copy/paste the payload of the original msg into the cross-post.

Fix 1 is impossible for existing past threads. Fix 2 is tedious and it’s a maintenance burden esp. if a post needs edits or updates. Fix 2 is also problematic because if I withold the original link, users cannot find other discussions that are scattered; but if I supply the original link, then non-Fedia readers cannot reach the OP anyway.

That will mean we don't show up in search engines and whatnot, which for some will considered a good thing and will likely cause others to leave.

Worth mentioning that paywall sites handle this by giving crawlers special treatment. I’m not necessarily suggesting that though.

There is a remaining problem related to the login form. Calls to the login page are breathtakingly expensive,

The login form loads must be through the roof because whenever a non-fedia user follows a cross-post into fedia, they are redirected to a login form which did not happen before.

There would be some relief if Mbin would implement a cross-post feature that automatically copies the OP text into the body, which would cut down on the number of visits. At the same time, I’ve always considered that a sloppy approach because edits are not sychronised. So in principle the threadiverse probably needs a smarter API specifically for cross-posts.

The use of 3rd-party clients would obviously give relief on the login form loading. But I have not found any decent 3rd-party clients for Lemmy or [km]bin - (perhaps because I’m fussy… I could really use a text UI in linux that stores content locally).

[–] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io -2 points 2 months ago

If a resource blocks certain IP addresses, that is not open access. It is access restricted. It is a deliberate blockade against a demographic of people.

“Open data” has different meanings in different bodies of law, so your comment is meaningless without context. But in any case, we can call shenanigans whenever an “open data” legal definition fails to thwart access restrictions in an Emporer wears no clothes type of attempt.

IOW, you cannot claim that an access restriction ceases to exist on some emotional plea that you believe the access restriction is just, appropriate, or necessary. An access restriction is an access restriction. “Open” implies open to all people, not some select demographics.

[–] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago

Yes I understood that but it is not correct. We choose to use Tor for privacy, not to lose access to resources. There is no exclusion on the Tor side of this.

[–] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago (4 children)

You don’t know how Tor works. The Tor community has exit nodes on the clearnet which give them inclusion. When a tor user is blocked, the exclusion is done by the resource, not from the Tor side. The tor network in no way excludes people from accessing legal publications.

[–] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I mentioned that, along with the problem of that. As well as the problem of searching using private sector tools.

We should not be pushed to use private search engines like Google, Bing, or their syndicates to find public resources. Public administrations have an “open data” obligation to some extent. Certainly the EU knows where the member state’s implementations are.

[–] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago (10 children)

This is generally saying if you are being discriminated against, change whatever your demographic is that is subject to discrimination. Putting oneself inside the included group does nothing to remedy the fact that there is an excluded group of people.

It’s also wrong to assume everyone has clearnet access. At this very moment I am using a machine that does not have clearnet access.

[–] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago

What an anti-feature. Thanks for pointing that out! Should be corrected now.

[–] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well that rationale doesn’t withstand the fact that people can change their gender identity without updating their ID docs. Recipe for disaster.

[–] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I was thinking about doing that. I read that mother of vineger is not necessary, but it speeds up the process. I also read that results are only good with certain beers like brown ales.. and I think IPA was given as an example of a bad result (i’m assuming due to the hoppy bitterness).

[–] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I mainly use it on fried potatoes, and I’m open to experiments, perhaps with lentil salad. I am familiar with Sarson’s and managed to find another bottle of that but I would like to try more varieties of malt vinegar. Saw a small bottle of lambic-based vinegar in a speciality shop and didn’t buy it because the price is a bit high (€14).

[–] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well, it wouldn’t require lying but certainly it seems tricky. You can deregister before you leave the country and neglect to provide an address for where you are going -- because you wouldn’t necessarily know in advance and you cannot provide information that does not exist. So they clear your address from your id card which then just has an empty address.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but you don’t have a specific legal obligation to state where you live abroad.

Though one snag is that you have a legal obligation to vote in elections and you must vote in the nearest embassy, which requires giving an address to get on the voting roster. However, voting is not strictly enforced. If you fail to vote there is a small fine but I don’t think they actually hit unregistered people abroad with that. If you do not vote in 3 consecutive elections, then you could lose your voting rights for a few years, I think.

I do not believe the bank gets a notification that you have deregistered. But at some point your ID card on the bank’s files will expire and they will expect an updated copy and freeze your account until they receive it.

If you walk into an embassy to “renew” your passport, do they demand an address? I would think you would pick up your passport at the embassy a week later. Or do they mail it?

Anyway, I can understand giving in to surveillance and disclosing US ties, but OTOH it seems like a nightmare to do what’s expected as well.. to be tagged as a toxic US person. It’s a mess either way. Perhaps the wisest move is to “move” to Canada, stay there a couple months, setup residency, then move to the US and just neglect to mention it. Get mail forwarding from Canada.

view more: ‹ prev next ›