I gave you the up vote because it's a good take, but this really has nothing to do with the article, so I can tell that you and a bunch of your 58 up voters didn't read it
anus
This guy (a founding engineer of fly.io) isn't claiming his 10x status in the article on the grounds that he uses AI
Indeed, he's claiming that he gets value from AI despite being a 10xer without it
I have to say that you just have to sayed something up
Revenue is a standard unit of measurement for any venture backed business because it gauges interest and growth better than profit does
What makes him a wanker?
- I'm not really interested in trying to burn anyone and despite my nuanced understanding of the Luddites, I do think dismissing a Luddite take in the context of technological progress is legitimate
- I care about ethics and governance too but I live in a capitalist society and I'm here to discuss the merits of a technology
This is a pretty good take imo
Like AI, IoT is an important and lasting technology
But too many businesses and products jumped on a misguided bandwagon to pull stupid uniformed VC money
You should look into how Dieselgate worked
I don't think you understand my take
I guess that makes it a bad analogy
If this dev doesn't do it, the next one will
This dev is analytical enough to understand basic incentive modeling and game theory. Capitalism is a race to the bottom no less now than it always was.
This is a brilliant take. Whoever designed my car's screen system can kick rocks
I actually don't really understand what you're arguing about. I saved this and read it a few times but I don't understand your question