antonim

Yeah, but they’re separate

They're literally not.

Threads accounts are closely integrated with Instagram accounts. By default, Threads and Instagram accounts share the same username, profile picture, and display name, although the profile picture and display name can be customized. Users can choose which accounts they follow on Instagram will carry over to Threads, either with the other person's Threads account already created or set to automatically follow them once an account is created.[36] As of August 2023, if a user decides to terminate their Threads account, they must delete their associated Instagram account as well.[37] Adam Mosseri, the CEO of Instagram, has acknowledged this limitation and stated that they are exploring options for a user to delete only their Threads account.[38]

Users are required to have an Instagram account to use Threads. Threads is a companion app to Instagram, and it uses Instagram to authenticate the user's identity and connect with their network.[32]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threads_(social_network)

Man, I wish.

regards, an occasional Wikipedia editor

Oldest gen-alphas are currently 13. First generation beta child will be born on 2025

These generational labels make increasingly little sense.

boomer = older than me

zoomer = younger than me

as simple as that

It's ridiculous that this comment got downvoted so harshly. Wikimedia currently has 250 million $ in assets. They also spend >100 million each year, and for the life of me I can't imagine where that money could have gone, certainly not on the servers and improving the UX (the recent redesign was totally useless, as far as I could notice). Wikipedia by itself certainly could be funded just from the interest.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Guy_Macon/Wikipedia_has_Cancer

It feels awkward to complain about your site, because the texts really are excellent and it's all made for free, but could you add the dates to the posts, when they were published? To me it's starting to become difficult to figure out which situation the older texts were made in, what stuff they're implicitly referring to, etc.

If you give it 10 statements, 5 of which are true and 5 of which are false, and ask it to correctly label each statement, and it does so, and then you negate each statement and it correctly labels the negated truth values, there’s more going on than simply “producing words.”

Which part of the 'more that's going on', whatever that actually is, corresponds to the human definition and understanding of truth and falseness?

Do you know the source? Looks fun.

Instead of 'cheating/lying', I'd prefer to say it 'simulated cheating/lying'.

“It doesn’t know the difference between true and false, it only knows the difference between true and false.”

Knowing how to produce words is not equivalent to knowing what those words mean in relation to the extralinguistic world. Unless you're a hardcore derridean poststructuralist or something.

Ovo izgleda kao da bi bilo jako zanimljivo da razumijem o čemu je riječ.

one view with NewPipe

Look at the hands in the upper corners, looks pretty AI-ish.