antonim

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] antonim 16 points 2 years ago (4 children)

extreme poverty and shortages of (nutritious) food are as severe if not worse in present day US

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_famine_of_1921%E2%80%931922

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_famine_of_1930%E2%80%931933

Your comparison is straight-up deranged, I have no softer words.

[–] antonim 21 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Why’s it at +157/-3 after 3hr:

Because blahaj.zone doesn't count the downvotes. The -3 downvotes that you see are only those that are counted by the instance you're viewing from (given out by the users of that instance only). Right now, on lemmy.world it has 28 downvotes, on dbzer0 it has 2.

[–] antonim 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I've read it in high school, many years ago :D It was one of the 2-3 assigned readings that the class clearly enjoyed over all those four years (along with Decameron and Crime and Punishment).

As far as I remember, it parodies the philosophical (or theological) idea by Leibniz that this is the best of all possible worlds, which is supposed to explain why God allows it to be apparently so shitty - it's still the best you can get. IMO it's not really fair to just describe it as "everything is going to be ok", as you and Voltaire do, because the original idea is not really optimistic or pessimistic with regards to what you can expect of the world, it is in fact just deeply apathetic (and a bit dumb).

The difference in the meme here is that "everything is going to be ok" is not a hard philosophical law, but a conspiracy theory, going aginst the accepted or obvious knowledge. It suggests some active, nefarious force behind the scenes, unlike Leibniz's inertia.

[–] antonim 11 points 2 years ago
[–] antonim 132 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (16 children)

The last part of your comment sounds like an ad straight out of those overlong YT videos.

[–] antonim 12 points 2 years ago

Fan service

This article may be written from a fan's point of view, rather than a neutral point of view.

hmm

[–] antonim 21 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Really?

Indeed. He's the director of a Russian foundation, teaches at a Russian university, and is being legally bullied by Russia, as you can see from my three-sentence summary. I'm pretty sure you can't do all that from Portugal or something.

I think he very much should have thought of himself as one. His mistake.

He should've thought of himself as not currently able to travel to Russia?

Ok, lol.

[–] antonim 16 points 2 years ago (9 children)

Ok, and? It's completely obvious the person in question is not among those.

[–] antonim 53 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (18 children)

Huh? He couldn't not travel to Russia, he's a Russian.

[–] antonim 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

stochastic terrorism

Is there non-stochastic, predictable terrorism?

How do you know what was the purpose of the attack? I can't find anything in the media on his goals.

which is why constant shocks of stochastic terrorism have helped increase police budgets in a time period where no one trusts the police and considers them a government-sanctioned group of thugs who will lie, cheat, and steal to ruin your life.

OP is not in USA.

[–] antonim 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Your word choice is just bizarre. Nobody would be excluded, they'd only have to make a profile on a different, normal server. And nobody would be "hurt" by not having access to Lemmy's memes about Linux and similar stuff.

just don’t follow any of them if you’re not interested in any of them

Except that theoretically my "All" feed would still be full of garbage-tier content that people typically expect and post on Meta's services, and that userbase with its same mindset would eventually spill over into the communities that I do follow too.

[–] antonim 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, but they’re separate

They're literally not.

Threads accounts are closely integrated with Instagram accounts. By default, Threads and Instagram accounts share the same username, profile picture, and display name, although the profile picture and display name can be customized. Users can choose which accounts they follow on Instagram will carry over to Threads, either with the other person's Threads account already created or set to automatically follow them once an account is created.[36] As of August 2023, if a user decides to terminate their Threads account, they must delete their associated Instagram account as well.[37] Adam Mosseri, the CEO of Instagram, has acknowledged this limitation and stated that they are exploring options for a user to delete only their Threads account.[38]

Users are required to have an Instagram account to use Threads. Threads is a companion app to Instagram, and it uses Instagram to authenticate the user's identity and connect with their network.[32]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threads_(social_network)

view more: ‹ prev next ›