anarchiddy

joined 5 months ago
[–] anarchiddy 61 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Unpopular opinion but social media has always been fundamentally public.

Unless they're scraping private dm's on encrypted devices, this should come as no surprise to anyone.

The good news is that nobody has exclusive right to data on federated platforms, unlike other sites that will ransom their user's data for private use. Let's not forget that many of us migrated here because the other site wanted to lock down their api and user data so that they could auction it to google for profit.

[–] anarchiddy -2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Reposting these memes shows up on everyone's feed regardless of if they're subscribed or federated with .ml - i'm not speaking for 'everyone', only pointing out who your script is impacting, which is everyone in that subset.

Not everyone has gotten banned on .ml.

[–] anarchiddy -1 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Making the experience worse for everyone because you have a personal ideological disagreement with another instance is hardly what I'd consider a justified moral crusade, but it's easy enough to block reposts when they're coming from a single user, so you do you.

[–] anarchiddy -1 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

Sure, but:

  • That doesn't excuse not even attempting a first-blush attempt at authoring even just the title yourself

and

  • Constantly reposing duplicates en-mass makes the experience way worse for those of us who don't have a personal vendetta against particular target lemmy instances and who haven't defederated with them out of spite or distaste

do what you want but this is basically just petty vandalism

[–] anarchiddy 1 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

Sometimes I get the vague sense that I've already seen a post in my /all view, but I don't think i've ever seen them back to back like this. Not even the title is different

[–] anarchiddy 11 points 3 weeks ago

I sure am glad that we learned our lesson from the marketing campaigns in the 90's that pushed consumers to recycle their plastic single-use products to deflect attention away from the harm caused by their ubiquitous use in manufacturing.

Fuck those AI users for screwing over small creators and burning down the planet though. I see no problem with this framing.

[–] anarchiddy 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Against.

A harder question for me is whether or not to get rid of public downvotes altogether. I think most interactions would be less hostile without the downvote option at all.

[–] anarchiddy 43 points 4 weeks ago (7 children)

Just so we're all on the same page - this is the same disjointed wage growth we were seeing under Biden that we were being told wasnt a big deal. It's obviously gotten worse under Trump, but this has been a growing problem since at least the dotcom bubble

[–] anarchiddy 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I personally see more similarity between philip and cm0002, but who knows.

[–] anarchiddy 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Lmao I thought you were joking for a second

Shout out to PJ who embodies the "fuck you, I will NEVER stop posting" mentality

[–] anarchiddy 1 points 1 month ago

A mod can correct me if im wrong, but my understanding is that, yes, it goes to all of those people

Ive reported a comment before for breaking a community rule, only to have the user banned on my own instance but not in the community or community instance. Which means they can continue interacting with my comments but I can't see it or respond to it.

Intuitively, it makes sense that if a user is breaking a rule, it should potentially run all the way up the chain - but sometimes the community rule is far stricter and sometimes the instance rule is. Imo they should make this a little cleaner

view more: ‹ prev next ›