Maybe in the 1940s, but I don't think it's known for antisemitism today.
According to the ADL, it's the 7th least antisemitic country among the 103 surveyed. https://www.adl.org/adl-global-100-index-antisemitism
Maybe in the 1940s, but I don't think it's known for antisemitism today.
According to the ADL, it's the 7th least antisemitic country among the 103 surveyed. https://www.adl.org/adl-global-100-index-antisemitism
Social media is a circle jerk machine: It will reinforce any sentiment to it's absolute limit.
A sub like the one you suggested will inevitably turn into a anti-trans hate machine. No such space will exist for long on Lemmy, nor should it.
I'm sorry to see that everyone seems to assume your question is in bad faith. But considering what you're asking for - that's kind of understandable, isn't it?
Me, two minutes ago. Really had to get a good stretch in to place my masterpiece.
ffmpreg?
Wenn man den all oder local feed benutzt kommt man auch durch Zufall hier vorbei. Sechs Leute haben wahrscheinlich noch nicht rausgefunden, wie man communities blockt.
Ach, äh, ich glaube das kann eine lokale Spezialität bleiben. Im Teller find ich das schlimm genug, da ist aber wenigstens noch eine Scheibe Ei dabei.
Vielleicht hab ich den Artikel zu schnell gelesen, aber gefühlt ist das ganze ziemlich nichtssagend?
Wenn ich es zusammenfassen müsste wäre das wohl ungefähr:
Das Führungsmodell der Nazis enthält viele Elemente, die schon vorher in Führungsmodellen benutzt wurden und auch heute benutzt werden. Die Sachen, die beim Führungsmodell der Nazis neu waren treffen auf aktuelle Führungsmodelle zwar nicht unbedingt zu, aber gruselig ist das ja schon.
OK? Was soll ich davon mitnehmen?
How would they know that europe.eu is a legitimate government website? Anyone can register a .eu domain. If it ever expires, anyone can buy it. And even if they built a team that whitelists government websites, do you really want to have spam from them whitelisted? What if they get hacked, what if they use spam for military disinformation campaigns.
My point being: One email doesn't even tell you if their service sucks. Much less that Google is an enemy service and must be banned.
There are plenty of reasons to not use Google. There are even a bunch of reasons to ban Google. One false positive in their spam filter is not one of them.
Op had a false positive in their spam filter, and is now posting in multiple communities as if this was a clear sign that Google is part of a conspiracy to destroy the EU.
There are plenty of good reasons to not use Google. They're a monopoly, a privacy nightmare and their services continually become worse in pursuit of minmaxing profits. Heck, even gmails spam filter sucking is a good reason.
But OP had one false positive in their spam filter, and is now calling for banning Google because they're an enemy service.
That's insane conspiracy theorist behavior, which was my point.
Taking a single false positive in your spam folder as a sign that Google has joined a campaign against the EU sounds insane.
They literally control Google Search, Youtube, the entire Android ecosystem, have a small army of lobbyists and hundreds of billions of dollars to influence politicians, and instead of the literal millions of more effective attack vectors they have, putting .eu domains in their spam filters somehow made it onto their priority list? Really?
Especially when the alternative explanation is simply, that Google's spam filter had a false positive, like all spam filters have.
Ah yes, googles brilliant plan to destroy the EU by maliciously sending mail from europe.eu to the spam folder.
Me breaking a phone by kicking it into a wall. I always instinctively try to catch it with my foot, and it never works out so well.