adespoton

Well, for starters, if all these people left, the only ones still at ICE would be there for one very obvious reason, that has nothing to do with immigration.

I wish reporters wouldn’t conflate two timelines.

On June 26, Citrix had no verifiable evidence that it was being exploited.

On July 9, Gossi had evidence that it had been exploited as far back as June 23.

Now, Citrix isn’t innocent in all this; they’ve had 3 days to put out an update stating there’s now evidence it was abused as early as June 23.

But that second paragraph in no way damns the first: an executive at Citrix had as little evidence as everyone else of the abuse 3 days after it had begun. That does indicate that telemetry to flag this sort of thing was lacking though — and Citrix knew about the issue itself long before; that’s just when it was made public and immediately abused.

Well, in BC, there’s new light rail partially funded by the federal government currently being built out to Langley from Vancouver, and new builds of townhomes and apartments are all over the place.

So… yes?

Once believed by whom?

Something to do with ballet?

Seems to me that it’s time for other nations to make the best of the prisoner’s dilemma and drop tariffs with each other while sanctioning the US. After all, the US at this point has broken almost all its treaties and trade agreements. There’s no reason for the rest of the world to honour what no longer exists.

See the thing is, all those regulations about conflict of interest were in place for a reason. If there’s no way you could have interfered with an investigation, nobody will claim you did for long.

But because of how Trump has restructured government, there is absolutely no way to clear up the Epstein investigation. Too much could have been tampered with, with no way to prove it wasn’t. And the video of Trump and Epstein was public knowledge before he gained power, so that’s going to be virtually impossible to gaslight.

Carry CHAINS?

And those status reports will be generated by AI, because that’s where the real savings is.

So you treated it like a junior developer and did a thorough review of its output.

I think the only disagreement here is on the semantics.

Yeah, I’ve added AI to my review process. Sure, things take a bit longer, but the end result has been reviewed by me AND compared against a large body of code in the training data.

It regularly catches stuff I miss or ignore on a first review based on ignoring context that shouldn’t matter (eg, how reliable the person is who wrote the code).

I’ve had success with:

• dumping email threads into it to generate user stories,
• generating requirements documentation templates so that everyone has to fill out the exact details needed to make the project a success
• generating quick one-off scripts
• suggesting a consistent way to refactor a block of code (I’m not crazy enough to let it actually do all the refactoring)
• summarize the work done for a slide deck and generate appropriate infographics

Essentially, all the stuff that I’d need to review anyway, but use of AI means that actually generating the content can be done in a consistent manner that I don’t have to think about. I don’t let it create anything, just transform things in blocks that I can quickly review for correctness and appropriateness. Kind of like getting a junior programmer to do something for me.