Being vegan requires less production. And animal waste, runoff, and methane are all major sources of pollution that being vegan eliminates. It takes less water, land, and plants for a vegan diet than it does to feed animals for agriculture.
WldFyre
joined 2 years ago
My point is proven science, you didn't ask for a source you just claimed the opposite, so you're on the same footing as me.
Except for my point is obvious, between the methane and animal waste run off, the water required for animal agriculture, the waste products unused from meat production, and the fact that you have to grow even more plants to feed the animals instead of eating the plants directly, I don't see why on earth you wouldn't see how being vegan has a smaller footprint.
Read a scientific study in-between your theory, sometime.
Lol You didn't provide a rebuttal to my claim either
Better than nothing! Feel free to reach out if you have any questions about it
Lol sure thing buddy, whatever you got to tell yourself
Because it's better for the environment and can be done healthily, unlike flirting with heart stroke for no reason lol
I hope you're vegan
It does look a lot like Paget, which is a French name pronounced differently
Hating your ex and actively trying to negatively affect them years after divorce are not the same thing lol
Bunch of children on this post smh
Thanks! I'll try it out over 4th of July weekend!
Turing Complete looks really interesting! How polished is it? Just looked it up and saw it was in early access
If the country doesn't become communist, calling yourself communist has done no good.