Transtronaut

Sounds like they went considerably beyond Blizzard, at least in treatment of workers.

If I recall correctly, it's also the name of a horse in Robin Hood: Men in Tights. Thanks to this thread, I finally get the joke, all these years later.

Turns out you're so pro-poor, even your grammar is poor. :P

If the user has indicated that they are not interested in new features, it means they do not care about new features. They don't want to know about them, or they prefer to find out proactively in their own time. If you still insist on ramming notifications down their throat at that point, you're not doing it for the user. You're doing it for yourself.

In a world without dark design patterns, there would be a single pop-up when you first install the application, to ask if you want notifications and/or suggestions for new features. If you click "no", it should never bother you again unless you go into a menu and opt in. Anything beyond that is inherently predatory.

Ideally, that pop-up wouldn't even exist. They could just have a collective "don't bother me again" checkbox on every non-essential notification, so you can easily disable it the first time they become relevant. If your user has already indicated that they are not interested, any further pestering is essentially harassment.

Yeah, exactly - that's what I mean. Hypothetically, if 50% of the violence done by women involves men, then the 82% is really more like 91%, and the violence attributed to women starts to look more and more like a rounding error. This meme is getting more rational all the time. It's almost like bringing statistics into it does nothing but present a lame fig leaf to cover up the underlying, endemic problem that inspired the meme in the first place.

It also makes me curious what percentage of that 18% was directed towards men as opposed to women. All that would be left in this hypothetical is women-on-women violence, so anything else should be discounted for a fair comparison.

I've occasionally dreamt about doing this with a bar. I picture it like the sitcom Black Books, but with booze instead of books.

Never said they were anything like the same. Just that neither of them had done anything particularly worthy of a Nobel peace prize. As you say, every American president in the past century would have gotten one, were that the case.

Oh, for sure. I'm not saying they should have given one to Obama. That and Kissinger are why it's not completely unthinkable that Trump might actually get one somehow.

The deal thing is a smokescreen. The real reason he's upset is that he badly and urgently wants to end a war. It's the only chance in hell he'd ever get a Nobel peace prize, and in his delusional mind, he's still competing with Obama.

That's a good thing - helps keep the quality level up, and leaves room for other indies.