Tom742

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Fingers crossed

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I’m holding out on my vote so trump can have another turn. I’ll vote for biden in 2028 so he can spend some time thinking about how to do a better job. Maybe he’ll be powered up by then like you said

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/c/piracy

Not generally a fan of the community, but they have a very active piracy forum.

https://rentry.co/megathread

This megathread has what you need to get started

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Snowrunner is like Breath of the Wild with trucks, lots of fun.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Charles Beard's An Economic Interpretation of the United States Constitution

This is exactly the book I didn’t know I needed to read, thank you!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Same. I like to rationalize it as them thinking about their (class) problems in very selfish and largely un-critical ways, then conversing with other like minded individuals who share selfish (class) interests, then they write those ideas down and that becomes what is taught to all. Since they hold an overwhelming monopoly on power those ideas remain largely unchallenged as they go on to shape history. They make sense from their point of view to me, because it’s exactly their point of view, without any consideration for the possibility of my point of view. It’s the various interpretations and justifications after the fact that filter their way through the generations. It really makes the idea that we have an unchanging constitution extra terrifying.

It’s our point of view and our expectations that their words mean “liberty and freedom for all,” but their point of view meant exactly what was on the tin “liberty and freedom for all (of my class)”

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Slaves were just as instrumental in the war of independence as they were in the Civil War. During both conflicts they were misled by false promises of freedom. It’s a very fascinating part of American history that has been largely overlooked by white male historians, go figure.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I feel it’s also important to note that the majority reason the north wanted to end slavery was not out of humanitarian reasons, although that was a factor. It was an economic conflict between the northern and southern economies essentially. The north couldn’t really compete with the south when the north has to pay wages and the south doesn’t. This point of time is very deep and very wide. Lots to read and lots to study.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Really well said.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At the time Britain didn’t have as much of a military and had a lot of debt due to overstretching their empire essentially, so there were a lot of fears that the American colonies could get away from Britain both economically and authoritatively. One way they thought to reign in this rogue colony was by instituting a sugar and molasses tax, which would siphon money to pay off war debts. This was extra insulting because the American colonist didn’t see themselves as British, this was seen as paying off another countries debt. They saw themselves as American, a vital component of any settler colonial state. Netanyahu doesn’t present himself as a resident of New Jersey. He is an Israeli citizen.

Another way they looked to contain the American colonies was to limit westward expansion, correct. Unchecked expansion would very quickly let the colony get out of control.

While England profited extremely well from the Atlantic slave trade, namely, by turning that cheap cotton into textiles, they also started turning an eye towards ending slavery, both at home and abroad in colonies, including the Americas. This becomes an important factor and a major concern for both the the slaveholding colonists and the slaves themselves seeking freedom.

It’s no great big coincidence that the constitution laid out a future date ending the importation of slaves. Northern parties wanted to end slavery immediately, or at least lay out the foundation in the path forward for ending slavery. The slave holding parties involved were OK with this middle ground because they foresaw that they wouldn’t need to import any more slaves if they would turn their attention towards breeding programs.

Britain tried a lot to kind of smother the colonies in the cradle. Shame they didn’t do more.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

The book Settlers is always highly recommended and it delves into this event a little, a good companion piece could be The 1619 Project as well!

view more: ‹ prev next ›