Taringano

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

LA is also quite a drive from LA

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Kind of selfish form you, aren't you thinking about the shareholders?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago
  1. Make absolutely no money and have minuscule audience

  2. Create your own instance Beacuse why not

  3. Crippled in debt due

7.???

  1. Profit.
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Oh hey I was living this a few months ago!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Also complex and random requirements for passwords

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Ghost of tsushima does that and won my heart for it. (well for that it won even more)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Unions will say that without the /s

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

In an interview Sam altman said "they realise the amount of money they needed would never come only from donations.

It's still kind of a foundation, he mentioned it in the Lex Friedman podcast.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

Excuse me, Crowded Ohio beach.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Worth something, not 20 bucks per user per month.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Só your solution is instead of charging the viewer charge who? The person that puts videos up?

Do you really think your anonymized user data is worth the 20 bucks/user the YouTube premium costs?

In your mind YouTube can just sell the data for the 2 billion users they have and instantly make 40 billion dollars a month from that?

view more: ‹ prev next ›