SomeGirlsHaveAPenis

joined 3 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Probably not fun and certainly difficult, but she knew precisely what she was getting into and who Musk was when she took the job. My sympathy and empathy levels for her are below zero.

 

Even so, her tainted legacy working for a Nazi will never be forgotten. Never should have taken the job, Linda.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jul/09/x-ceo-steps-down-linda-yaccarino

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I agree. But is it possible that Musk would want that kind of association to pilfer as many gullible MAGA as possible? I think it is -- but I dunno. I don't think many people left of center would support Musk's party, so in my mind, Musk is clearly aiming for the center to extreme right for support, and to influence republican politicians already in office. Basing that on his threats to primary every republican who voted for the bill.

 

File under: To be a MAGA turned Musk fanboy

Who knows if this dumb ass name will take off for the new Musk Nazi party. Imagine being proud of people calling you a degenerate? Or wanting to call yourself that? Wear it in public on a t-shirt or a hat? Well you don't have to imagine it now. FFS.

Question: Have we reached peak stupidity yet?

Don't answer that, please.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

He also got Texas to rename Boca Chica to Starbase for his SpaceX headquarters. I can only guess that Hawthorne city council (Hawthorne used to a be a "sundown town" - whites only, so you can imagine the appeal to Musk being there) weren't very keen on Musk renaming the city to SpaceXland, or Musk City. Anyway, he's a perpetual and petulant man-child. I sincerely hope he's on the first disastrous Starship journey to Mars.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I didn't make either of the graphs, nor am I involved in any capacity with the linked article or surveys, so no apologies necessary. I'm only guilty of sharing them, and I get why it was confusing. Also, I didn't think you were being mean, so don't give it another thought. :) It's all good.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Yeah, MAGA have been campaigning on that. It's the same old jingoistic bullshit from 100 years ago. The day anybody in MAGA cracks open a history book will be... erm... historic, I suppose. Ditto for Muskito fanboys. We're scraping the bottom of the barrel at this point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

The word libertarian is likely too big and unwieldy for the bigots who are likely to join Musk's latest foray into politics. They'd spell it wrong all the time, probably call it the "Liberty Party." Besides, most people have very negative views of the libertarian party, especially since more than half of them became pro-Trump in 2015, defended the tiki torch Nazis and KKK in 2017, and stayed pro-Trump even after his first term. Fuck libertarians. Shit, fringe party. Also, Musk is seeking to pilfer as many MAGA as he can get, and calling it the "America Party" is precisely the sort of thing that would appeal to the white Christian nationalists, theocrats, xenophobes and the dumbest, most gullible people in America. Musk has learned from Trump that it's better to be the leader of a party in order to get richer.

 

I suppose most of you came to Lemmy because you'd had enough of Reddit. Maybe you thought Reddit sucks or is poorly managed? Didn't like certain changes there? Maybe you got unfairly banned or suspended? Maybe Lemmy was your backup plan, or still is? In my case, it's a backup for when my Reddit account eventually gets permanently banned. By the way, this will be a long post of text. Fair warning. I know people don't enjoy reading these days. Sorry.

As of this writing, I'm on a 3-day ban for supposedly encouraging harm or violence, which I didn't do. I'll add the photo of what I got banned for at the bottom of this post. I'm currently waiting to see how my appeal goes. While my account there is only a few years old, I've only really been using it for the past 200 days or so. In that time, I have had my account suspended three times, all of which were successfully overturned on appeal because I didn't actually break any rules. And in all cases, the reason for the wrongful suspension/ban was for "encouraging harm or violence." I have also had seven warnings, all but one were successfully appealed. All this in 200 days. Hmm....

So this is a thing that keeps happening. And it happens because there are no bigger snowflakes than MAGA and Musk supporters. The so-called free speech party is anything but that. To be fair, it's not actually my speech that is an issue for them. It's me, personally. So they trawl through my post and comment history hoping to find anything that they can report to Reddit's admins which will be taken out of context or completely misunderstood. I know this, because comments that had been up for months and months without issue have sometimes been the ones they reported.

Sometimes the bans or suspensions are done by automation, a bot - meaning that no human looked at the potentially violative content. This is bullshit of course. For a bot to automatically suspend you, it requires many bad-faith reports from different accounts. Targeted harassment like this is almost always organized off of Reddit, usually some "conservative" Discord or some other non-public forum safe from the prying eyes of Reddit's admins. Anyway, these incels clearly have nothing better to do than to harass others and try to get people's accounts banned. They get off on that petty and juvenile shit.

Anyway, as I mentioned, I just got another ban. Surprisingly, I hadn't had a warning, suspension or ban in about three months until today. They had been happening about once per week on average. I haven't changed what I typically post -- anti-MAGA, anti-Trump, anti-conservative and anti-ICE stuff mostly. The only change I made was blocking all of the moderators of a certain conservative sub. That really seemed to make a difference in lowering the harassment I get. Go figure!

And I never comment, post or vote in any of the pro-MAGA, pro-fascism subs. I stick to my friendly subs. Today's offending comment/image that got me banned was in a sub that tracks what ICE is doing. I made the comment five days ago, in response to a group that is identifying ICE agents, and that group's websites are constantly taken down by the actual Nazis in the US government. And sub moderators and Reddit admins keep taking down posts that mention the Ice List or provide a link to it.

Truth be told, I'm not a fan of social media, and I'm including Reddit and Lemmy as social media. These are my only social media accounts. I don't have accounts at or use any other services like Twitter or Facebook, Threads or Bluesky. I won't be heartbroken if I can't use Reddit any longer. I find it useful to a limited extent, much bigger audience generally, but many of the restrictions are asinine. Those restrictions leave no room for nuance or context. Admins consistently fail to use proper discernment. It's impossible to explain that nuance or context of your banned comment or post when appealing a ban because you get ONLY 250 characters to appeal. They purposely hamstring your appeal defense. Sure, they're busy, they've got tons of appeals to go through, because tons of people are getting banned every fucking day. Maybe the problem is the ease in which people get banned, with far too many of them undeserving of being banned to begin with? Maybe? Maybe it's Reddit's bullshit reporting system being abused by bad faith actors? Maybe?

I've not encountered any of this harassment on Lemmy. The things I've posted to Reddit I've also posted here. In fairness, the userbase here is far smaller than Reddit. The worst I've had here on Lemmy is the same users who downvote practically every post I've made here. Eventually they'll get bored of that, if I don't get bored of posting here first. I'll probably get bored first.

My real issue isn't that Reddit restricts free speech, which it absolutely does and we can discuss forever whether they should. It's that Reddit has consistently sided with the Nazis and billionaires when deciding which speech it is going to restrict while allowing far right extremists to carry on advocating for actual violence against others. People were getting warned and banned for even mentioning Luigi Mangione's name, or posting up Super Mario Brothers gif images that Reddit freely supplies to all users. Why make that choice if not to support the very same people who are making everyone's life worse? What concerns me most is that people can't freely organize against the fascists. Fuck, even the Eat The Rich sub on Reddit doesn't allow comments that use the word the "revolution" out of fear of losing their sub, because the Reddit admins demanded it. That sub also started moderating posts and comments about Luigi, including several of mine. It's absurd. People do need to talk freely about fighting back against the Nazis. And if they can't do that, then we must assume that those online services support the Nazis.

Speaking of Nazis, the image I posted on Reddit follows. As you'll see, it is a WW2 propaganda poster that someone photoshopped and put a red hat on it. It doesn't advocate for violence. It advocates for defense from those who seek to be violent: fascists, Nazis, Proud Boys, MAGA.

The original WW2 poster can be seen here.

I know this was unnecessarily long, and I know that few people will read all of it and even fewer will care. The TL;DR is that the fascists are succeeding in part because Reddit and other social media are enabling them. And we have fewer places to post about what is happening with candor. At which point will these sites let people organize a proper defense against authoritarianism and fascism?

 
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Not being condescending at all, but what is the issue you're having with it?

I wonder if the original graph would be better or worse. It looked like this:

EDIT: Just saw your other comment -- I missed seeing it come in while looking up the original graph

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

OK, I don't know what the breakdown is and I'm unsure if I want to know. But if you go to this page (https://www.natesilver.net/p/elon-musk-polls-popularity-nate-silver-bulletin) and then scroll down to the section titled "The polls: What do the surveys say?" you'll get a chart with links to all of the polls. I suspect you'll get some decent demographic data within some of those surveys. I wouldn't hold it against you at all if you decide it's not worth the effort. Musk is a Nazi after all, and therefore I could [unfairly?] assume that anyone who supports a Nazi is also a Nazi.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

That is indeed the correct answer, and you have won the internet today. Congrats. The other acceptable answer was "It's a cult." A very nasty Nazi cult.

Have this!

 

See article "Tesla's Cybertruck flop is historic. The brand collapse is even worse" : https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/7/3/2331384/-Tesla-s-Cybertruck-flop-is-historic-The-brand-collapse-is-even-worse

But the question I am asking and you also might be asking is: How could even 36.9% of Americans hold a favorable view of an actual Nazi?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

True. Cybertrucks wouldn't even make it to the trial without breaking down first, falling apart, or spontaneously combusting.

 
 

"...the likes of which you cannot possibly comprehend."

 
 
 
view more: next ›