I feel like this is you fighting phantoms. I highly doubt anyone would want to actively help someone die instead like, referring them to a psychologist or therapist or something
SkyeStarfall
I guess it still leaves store-bought bread out I guess. Or yoghurt. Or milk
But nah, I really do think it's extreme. Pre-made food isn't bad for you
Either that or I'm just being European, idk
People didn't use to call those AI images. They used to call them images with a filter
Sure, some form of machine learning was involved, but so was your Google search for the previous decade. Unless one specifies what one means by AI, I still stand by my statement
In addition, OP's image was still real, even if it had a filter on. A lot of people's images have such filters on, especially since often they're applied automatically. That's the whole difference and the point
That's fair yeah. I'd say it'd depend upon the definition of modern history, but unless it's fairly narrow and recent, then yeah. Certainly not within the accepted definition of modern history
It's obviously ao3!
Speaking as someone in Europe
The US has a major effect on the rest of the world. Elon is a big concern even if you don't live in the US
..and you don't wanna see what's gonna happen aa the US progresses more into fascism and sets their sights for outside their borders. Hell, they've already done that with Canada and Greenland, even
So I see people arguing whether this is AI or not and I just wanna say that
What people should take away from all of this is that we're rapidly approaching a point where we're simply unable to accurately determine whether something is generated or not. And we, as individuals and as a society, are not ready for that. We're heading into a different world, and we better prepare for it, as well as re-examine our relationship to art and images before we're forced to do so by the circumstances
It's the Sword of Damocles but worse
I don't get that though, if a bird flu pandemic happens it would mainly affect and kill off his base
Great good faith response to my comment, for sure
I think you underestimate how many people might not have a complete understanding of consent, and just dismissing it outright like this isn't.. as productive as you might think it is
You say that, but there is a historical basis to making a point out of it
For example, martial rape wasn't considered rape or even sexual assault for a long time. And many people might also take someone not saying no as implicit consent, which is not necessarily the case
It can be a bit more nuanced than it may initially seem, in the sense that like, there can be different understandings of consent
Buuuut of course I don't know the context of your conversation
I wouldn't call bread or yoghurt prepared instead of processed personally though, they've been through multiple chemical and biological processes.
Ultra processes foods is something that tends to be more appropriate I think. That's stuff like chips or fast food. Though even that I consider fine to eat in moderation, and I, personally, do. Though I agree it would be better if I completely cut those out. I just tend to eat a lot of pre-made foods due to disability reasons (frozen pizzas, pastas, and the like)
But yeah, I do know that the US has some very lax food laws unfortunately. So maybe that is a big part of the difference