Is it normal to allow people to send military information to your enemy?
I'm not a huge fan of either of the two belligerent, but this is not exactly an unreasonable position to take. And they are at least putting reporters on notice.
Is it normal to allow people to send military information to your enemy?
I'm not a huge fan of either of the two belligerent, but this is not exactly an unreasonable position to take. And they are at least putting reporters on notice.
Wood.
I picked it up from an episode of Deep Space Nine. Good times.
The US is obligated by law,
Yea, that's a law we passed, right? One which we could repeal, too?
I thought I was wrong, once. But I was mistaken.
And we provide Israel weapons to bomb Gaza.
That doesn't always work.
We used to have an agreement, didn't we? What happened to it?
Oh. Right.
Are they running out of people to murder in Gaza? Or do they just need someone to fight back, so they can look oppressed?
There was the whole thing in Guantanamo Bay. And the awful treatment of civilians in Afghanistan. And in Iraq. And we can't forget the Vietnam war.
I think the guy you're talking to is a duck, but he's not all wrong.
Just because Trump isn't performing his duty doesn't mean that he doesn't have a duty.
Information flow can never go backwards. There's plenty of examples of reporters or even social media compromising military operations. In at least a few cases, it has lead to the destruction of military assets. Once broadcast, the damage is done.
Trying to force reporters to think hard about what they are broadcasting is a good thing, from the point of view of national defence.