Rhaedas

The act of "trying to push him into US waters" sounds like typical cop behavior. Pulled you over and can't find anything wrong enough to arrest you, so they push you around verbally or physically until you give them something to work with. Let me guess, they capsized the boat in their efforts, pulled him out of the water, and then said because he was on their boat now he's on American soil and therefore under arrest.

It's been very positive for leopards. I haven't seen any skinny ones in a while.

I think it was just a missed problem, as so many updates are for. Later games that I played would do something as simple as a timer attached to a dropped item to then force removal (including your old corpses). But I saw the mention of persistence in the post and the UO trash dilemma came to mind.

President Trump has delivered on more promises in just six months than any other president in our country’s history

I don't know about the last part, but it is true that the leopard has been very busy eating faces he said he'd eat.

It's been worse and worse over time for whatever reasons, but the AI summary at the top now can be way off. I had a result the other day where a quick glance (all that I give it as I scroll down to any results) I laughed because I could tell it was totally wrong, and couldn't even figure out where it got that result from. It wasn't in the results I found.

Giraffe In Giraffe Out

I remember in the early days of Ultima Online the game would allow persistence of things dropped, and it got so bad people were asking each other to help pick up and destroy "trash" because it lagged the servers. I can't recall why that couldn't be quickly patched or how long it lasted.

Even the best models fine tuned for coding still have training that was based on both good and bad examples of programming from humans. And since it's not AGI but using probability to generate the code, you're going to get crap programming logic dependent on how often such things were used and suggested by humans to other humans. Googling for an answer on how to code something pulls up all sorts of answers from many sources, but reading through them, many are terrible. An LLM doesn't know that, it just knows that humans liked some answers better than others, so GIGO.

Ai slop should be tagged

Even only a few months ago this would be a reasonable demand, but AI image generation is getting better, faster and faster. Ask any moderator or anyone who has seriously discussed HOW to single out what is and isn't AI created. Usually the consensus is the best anyone can do is ask for reports of suspicion and voluntary marking by the poster. Sure, some of the inferior is obvious, but a tag or ban should be thorough and not miss any, right? Otherwise such efforts are only catching the low fruit and letting the better AI pass because of ignorance. So rather than say "just tag/ban it", explain how one does that without sliding into the trap that those who wanted to ban porn did with the "I'll know it when I see it". What is a solid universal indication of AI images?

I don't think the objectors in this thread understand the point of the post. AI isn't the topic, the constant claims of AI slop to anything someone doesn't like is. Be nice if there was a "No AI material" button to apply, but it is not that easy to do, even when things are "obvious".

MAGA: "But those (probably) aren't citizens, so checkmate."

Good thing there's tools now to make a static image move.

Wake up!