PZK

When it comes down to it, reactionaries are going to be repulsed by systemic change.

Have them acknowledge a problem then ask them if they would be willing to uproot a major component of the system and change it to solve the problem. Provide a detailed and serious solution. You will quickly see how they suddenly become disinterested in solving the problem. You will also likely be disappointed in realizing how many reactionaries there actually are.

I keep seeing the claim that their are bots everywhere when liberals encounter something they disagree with... yet they have not been able to program their own chat bots to counter them?

Surely liberals would recognize this advantageous strategy and flood the internet with their own bots. Because we know that it couldn't just be them stepping outside of astroturfed reddit, only to find their ideas are not as popular as they we led to believe.

I suppose they will just keep labeling people uselessly when encountering conflicting evidence.

He better bring his scout lance of 4 assault mechs.

Reaching levels of copium not thought possible.

It is interesting how it always seems to be the people screaming about groomers are the ones doing the grooming. Every accusation is a confession.

...dedicated to fighting the woke-mind virus.

Someone has a mind virus, but it isn't the people he is talking about

Conseratives have lost the culture war because their culture is fucking garbage. Its just contrarian, "anti-woke" racist, religious shit wrapped in a country music wrapper and garnished with AR-15s. They have no culture worth crossing the street for. It is all about getting off to being an asshole and nothing else. The average person that hasn't spent time in conservative safe spaces and echo chambers is going to be repulsed by their trash at best. It isn't about being fun or welcoming, its about shouting "Fuck you, I'm Alpha." and trying to shame or scare you into being like them. It isn't popular amongst normies and never will be. It flat out makes people feel uncomfortable.

"This should be higher." "Savage." "Doggo." "Raises spork." "Russian bots are really active today." "CCP shills."

I love how he capitalized DESTROYS.

Yes, nothing proves you are intelligence and power incarnate like obsessively criticizing a live movie adaptation of a children's toy.

Can you imagine this thumbnail posted in something like 2010?

I would think either some kid ripping apart Barbie dolls like Sid for 45 minutes... or porn.

Liberals creamed themselves when Biden was elected, but not because they ousted Trump, but because they crushed the budding leftism.

Liberals: "Trump's tariffs are so incredibly stupid."

Also Liberals: "Let's keep them now."

The main issue I find with trying to argue on this front is that it is a fight that isn't needed.

Anyone who is usually arguing this, is usually is coming from some country that has literally no moral high-horse to speak on these issues. Especially if they are American. The genocide of Native Americans, enslavement of Black people, or even contemporary imperialism.

Why are they not up in arms about the largest imprisoned population in the world? Why don't they take issue with the treatment of homeless people? Why don't they take issue with the US ongoing support of coups and invasions of other countries?

They turn a blind eye to these issues because it isn't about the issues at all. The reason they bring up the Tianamen square massacre and the Uighur genocide is because they want to attack communism. You only need to point this out to them when they get upset and try to dismiss other issues as "whataboutism". Strip their intent down to its naked truth and expose their virtue signaling with the overwhelming amount of active atrocities they don't seem to care about.

Being succinct and to the point about why they actually care about arguing these things, because I fucking promise you they don't give a shit about those people. They want communism to fail. Hell, just troll them and talk about the My Lai Massacre or Kent State.

The point I make using this avenue of argument is that if you try to argue "what actually happened" its just going to be your facts vs theirs. They are the ones creating a moral argument, so show them that even they don't believe what they are preaching.