Nefyedardu

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (6 children)

it actually is, you just append the distrobox command before it

distrobox enter arch -- yay -Sy appname

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

If I was a newbie shopping around for a DE, I would probably be perusing websites like kde.org to get a feel for the visual style and features and such

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I don't know why it's become a stigma that installing things on Linux is hard when Windows requires you to Google sketchy .exes and .msis because their app store is so trash. For 99% of packages on Linux you can just open the software manager and click install.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

None of those commands install drivers on linux tho. What audio driver couldn't you install?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Do you just look for things to get mad at? This hasn't even been implemented yet. Even if it had, it would be opt-in. And even if you opt-in, the data is all anonymous and you would be able to see exactly the data that gets sent out. If Fedora or anyone else really wanted to spy on you, I assure you they wouldn't let you know beforehand.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They don't need to be packaged at the time of creation anyway, they can be packaged right now. Distrobox makes this easy, like let's say you need an application that only works on Ubuntu 18.04. It's two commands:

distrobox create --image ubuntu:18.04 ubuntu

distrobox enter ubuntu -- sudo apt-get install _package_

Then to export the package to your desktop you can even do

distrobox enter ubuntu -- distrobox export --app _application_

Boom, you have an Ubuntu 18.04 application on an OS of your choosing. You can theoretically do this with any distro, distrobox can use any OCI images from docker-hub, quay.io, or any registry of your choice.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I mean not really, Appimage has been around since 2004, flatpak/docker for about a decade now. But at any rate I don't see your point, the person I replied to said it's hard to run old applications on Linux and I gave him solutions on how to do that. What does their age have to do with anything?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

If it isn’t a Microsoft sanctioned solution, then multiple third party solutions exists that fix it.

That's not how this works. If it's not a Microsoft-sancioned solution, it literally cannot be fixed no matter how much effort you put in. You need an API to work with Windows. If Microsoft does not provide you with an API, you can't do it. And even if you find a way to hack together something, you have zero guarantee an update won't just come along and fuck it. Linux distros are open source, you can change quite literally any thing about them. That is what that person was talking about.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Appimage, Snap, Flatpak, Docker, Podman, Distrobox, Toolbox...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

laughs in flatpak

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

They do it so they can get clicks from curious kids mindlessly browsing through, it's easy money if you are willing to sacrifice your self-respect

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I hate how AI upscaling looks and I really don't get why everyone seems to be gaga over it. In addition to the artifacts and other weirdness it can introduce, it just looks generally like someone smeared vaseline over the picture to me.

view more: next ›