Muehe
joined 2 years ago
Charges weren't dropped. Neither the judge nor the prosecution sought detention, so she is just out until the next hearing happens (May 15th).
On April 25, Dugan appeared before U.S. Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Dries during a brief hearing in a packed courtroom at the federal courthouse. Dugan, wearing a black dress with white flowers, made no public comments during the brief hearing.
At the hearing, Dries asked if prosecutors were seeking detention, and they said they were not. He answered that he did not believe that the charges were “eligible” for detention.
As it ended, her attorney, Craig Mastantuono, told the court: "Judge Dugan wholeheartedly regrets and protests her arrest. It was not made in the interest of public safety."
Dugan made her federal court appearance a little more than two hours after she was arrested at the county courthouse at about 8 a.m. April 25.
it’s that they’re less competent
Not sure if that's true actually, the Nazis were supremely incompetent as well. It just doesn't take that much competence to smash a delicate balance like the separation of powers. You basically need control of one the three branches of government and you are good to try, Trump controls two and this news is about him smashing the third.
@DrDominate@lemmy.world Gave a very thorough explanation already, so I will just add some additional bits.
World of Warcraft had a lot of "expansions" over the years, which change the game in some very basic ways and sometimes even remove old content and Blizzard doesn't keep every expansion online at the same time, there are like "phases". For example right now you can play Classic/Era (no expansion), Cataclysm (third expansion), and War Within (latest expansion, aka retail). But some time ago there were servers for TBC (first expansion) and WotLK (second expansion), which by now have transitioned to Cataclysm (third expansion), and those will progress to MoP (fourth expansion) sometime later this year.
There is something to be said for trying the content chronologically, i.e. starting with Classic/Era, but with the release model Blizzard uses progressing "historically" is hardly possible on the official servers. There are however unofficial servers which can facilitate this to a degree (using them might be considered illegal though depending on your jurisdiction, but AFAIK nobody ever got punished for playing on them, only for hosting).
I'd ignore Hardcore and Seasons of Discovery until you know a bit more what you are doing, as they are modifications to the original.
Whichever expansion you choose, you will want to look into user made UI modifications, which are referred to as "addons". E.g. for the missing quest markers on the map in Classic/Era you can find addons that add them.
cause in the OG it’s like…why did you intentionally become less hot in order to knock out the competition?
Not sure about the Disney movie, but in the original fairy tale the queen is her mother (or step-mother in later version) so she has to disguise herself in order to not be recognised.
Bonus cruelty, the story ends with the queen being made to dance at the wedding in glowing hot shoes of iron until she dies.
Wie meinen? Meine Lesung ist das Frau Professor die Ungleichbehandlung super geil findet, und das sagt Sie an mehreren Stellen explizit:
Ist die Tatsache, dass es keine Wehrpflicht für Frauen gibt, also als ausgleichende Gerechtigkeit zu verstehen – für all die "gender gaps" zum Beispiel?
Ich möchte das so verstanden wissen. Rechtlich ist der Artikel aber so nicht ausgetestet.
Sie haben in Ihrem Artikel im Verfassungsblog im vergangenen Jahr eine allgemeine Dienstpflicht gefordert. Als Abschlussfrage: Wie würde Ihrer Meinung nach eine gerechte allgemeine Dienstpflicht aussehen?
So, dass nur Männer zur Wehrpflicht und ergänzend zur allgemeinen Dienstpflicht herangezogen werden. Ich finde, dass Frauen da komplett rausgehalten werden sollten.
Dein Vorposter wies hingegen darauf hin das die Ungleichbehandlung der Geschlechter in Artikel 12a ja bereits einmal vom Europäischen Gerichtshof als unzulässig eingestuft wurde. Das war zwar im Bezug auf das Dienstverbot für Frauen (Absatz 4), nicht auf die Wehrpflicht (Absatz 1), aber es stünde ja zu erwarten das auch diese Ungleichbehandlung kippen würde wenn dagegen mal jemand klagte.
I see the Reuters video has already been posted to this community, so I'll refrain from cross-posting the Guardian article here as well. @engene@lemmy.ca if you edit the post and set the following as "Thumbnail URL" it will show up in the websites/apps better: https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/e439f142-4f5c-475a-b1b0-d0ee102de6f7.jpeg
Guardian article: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/30/venezuelans-sos-texas
Image embed:
