Muaddib

joined 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Smeagol was redeemable, but it couldn't be done in the middle of a warzone by two desperate men who are carrying the source of his addiction.

Smeagol needed years of therapy by trained experts far away from the ring.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

I'm not saying an idiot with a pencil will produce good art, or art that's worth anyone else's time. But they will always have the potential to draw something worth their own time. Anyone can engage in a worthwhile artistic endeavour using a pencil. It's not about quality, or originality, or theming. It's about intention. Any idiot can communicate what their own ideas with a pencil, on some level.

For example, take Adolf Hitler. He was a terrible artist. He had no understanding of proportion. His paintings don't make logical sense. And you know what? That suits the man. Hitler was an idiot who couldn't make logical sense of the world. His paintings reflect his terrible mind. There is that much value in them as an endeavour of self-expression. I can look at a painting by Hitler and say "that's a Hitler".

I can also look at an AI generated image by Highborn Flunky and say "that's a Flunky", but Flunky is a good artist. Hitler is not. That's the difference I'm talking about. A painting reflects your soul even if you suck.

The difference between a camera and Stable Diffusion is that a camera makes it hard to convey artistic intent, while Stable Diffusion adds artistic intent that isn't yours. Making art with a camera is hard, but anyone can know it when they see it. Making art with Stable Diffusion is an endeavour complicated by the fact that the AI is using mass manufactured intent to pass of intentless creations as art. If you fail to convey your intent with a prompt, you don't get a dull scene, you get trendy bullshit.

And people are way more offended by being shown trendy bullshit by bad artists than boring scenes.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 4 weeks ago

I don't support a ban on eating meat, but I support a ban on making it. Charge the supplier, not the user. Raising a pet so you can kill it is obviously animal abuse, it should have been made illegal a long time ago.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago (6 children)

I've tried making AI art, and there was definitely skill involved. I understand why prompt engineering can be hard. Every word I added could have unpredictable effects, constrain the space of images that can be generated because of the correlations. Choosing between similes was important.

What I realised was that I was fighting against the model to put my intent in the art. The model was extrapolating things I didn't want to put in the art based on popularity and trends, and I was having to find workarounds to actually make what I wanted.

A pencil will never inject intent I don't want into my art. My hand might slip, I might get the proportions wrong. But I'll never try to draw a criminal and accidentally draw a black person because my pencil was exposed to more black criminals than white.

There are AI artists who can put their intent into their art. But they're 1% of the people making AI art. Most of the time, a majority of the intention comes from a computer copying trends. And that's not art. In order to make art, actual meaningful art with these programs, you have to be an expert.

Any idiot with a pencil is an artist. The pencil only does what you tell it. You don't have to work to make it yours.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

No, Bazzite is very hardware dependent. Good if you use the same hardware as the devs. If you don't, it'll make you want to go back to Windows.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

In Dune, thinking machines are banned. Not even calculators are allowed. Complex maths is done by trained savants. I'd argue a calculator is AI, since it's a humanmade device that can extrapolate information from information. That's the definition of intelligence.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Envy.

Rowling is upset that she's had to endure a lifetime of misogyny, and envious of men. When she sees trans women, she assumes they have it better than her because they got to be male, and gets mad at them for not enjoying having what she wants.

Steven Crowder isn't trans, but he does have a crossdressing fetish, and he's mad trans women get to do his fetish all day long. He wants that, but he can't have it because he'd eventually feel dysphoric.

Andrew Tate is furious that nobody thinks he's pretty. He has to traffick women in order to get them to have sex with him. He wishes he had the attention that women get, and he's mad that trans women are "males" who get to be pretty. He doesn't want to be a woman, but he wants someone to find him attractive.

Donald Trump just wants to be the center of attention. He doesn't hate trans people, but he knows attacking them gets him attention. He wants to be in the news.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 weeks ago

You're telling me an air fried these chips?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 weeks ago

Greta is 22, which makes her middle aged by Gazan standards

view more: ‹ prev next ›