Metaright

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

They're both Reddit-esque Fediverse platforms, but are developed and maintained by different people.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

How so? This post is not stopping anyone from enjoying the app.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Nobody is not letting them be.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How is this meme stopping people from enjoying things?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My notification links look like this. I'm not sure what to say about reproducing it, other than just getting a reply to your comment.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

There are adults in real life that have very petite bodies and could be mistaken for teenagers. Do you think they shouldn't be able to fall in love and start families?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

There are adults in real life that have very petite bodies and could be mistaken for teenagers. Do you think they shouldn't be able to fall in love and start families?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

No people scoff at the 1000 years old trope cause it’s transparently an excuse to portray sex with a child

That's exactly what I said.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's not great, but I don't think it would be utterly terrible.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I see. Thanks!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (12 children)

This is interesting.

People like to scoff at the idea of "1,000-year-olds in kids' bodies" for being just an excuse for pedophilia. The justification can only be that it doesn't matter if the person is mature; if it's a kid's body, it's wrong.

But this other idea, that it's okay to have sex with kids as long as the adult is in a kid's body, is clearly flimsy; the reason sex with kids is wrong is because they can't give informed consent.

But the objections to these ideas are mutually exclusive. If a man in a kid's body is still wrong for having sex with a kid, the issue at hand must be maturity. But then that "ancient deity in a kid's body" cannot be wrong, because they have the maturity required.

Both of these scenarios cannot be wrong simultaneously, and I think the only reasonable conclusion is that it's maturity and mental/emotional development that counts. So petite succubi must therefore be fair game.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Why were they over there?

view more: ‹ prev next ›