Melyssandre

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Melyssandre@jlai.lu 6 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Couscous tajine le sang (´・ᴗ・ ` )

[–] Melyssandre@jlai.lu 4 points 5 months ago

Merci de me confirmer l'evidence 😀

Tu remarqueras aussi qu’il a été traduit et publié dans une revue qui s’auto-décrit comme « une revue d’études féministes, queer et postcoloniales, héritière des pensées critiques ». Ce n’est donc sans doute pas un manifeste réac.

Vouiii, jai pas etait assez attentive aux details ^^"

[–] Melyssandre@jlai.lu 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

du coup ce serait le point de vue rapporte du programme "Le Stanford Gender Dysphoria Program" ?
Et non une definition personnelle de l'auteure, avant de definir les "bases" pour tout le monde. Avoir une definition commune avec le lectorat, avant de passer au coeur du sujet ?

Desolee, pour moi c'est pas explicite du tout XD,

[–] Melyssandre@jlai.lu 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

Cest ce passage qui me gene beaucoup, avec annotations :

Le Programme a été lancé en 1968 et son équipe, composée de chirurgiens et de psychologues, s’est d’abord attachée à collecter autant de données historiques que possible sur le transsexualisme. Je m’y arrête un instant afin de vous donner un bref exposé des résultats. ~~Un∙e transsexuel∙le~~ Transgenre est quelqu’un qui s’identifie au genre « opposé » à celui qui lui a été assigné [Gros raccourci, on parle de spectres, Mais je considere que cest "grand public", dou ma gene du coup]. Sexe et genre sont deux questions relativement distinctes, mais les ~~transsexuel∙le·s~~ brouillent généralement la différence entre les deux en mélangeant le caractère performatif du genre et la « réalité » physique du sexe morsque, parlant de la façon dont ils perçoivent leur situation, ils-elles disent être dans le « mauvais corps ». Si le terme même de ~~transsexuel·le~~ est récent [On parle bien ici au present ? Et non au passe ? Car oui en 68, transsexuel.le etait le seul terme, mais en meme temps en 68..], le phénomène l’est moins.

Du coup, je serai bien decue, que quelqu'un, de non hostile decouvre purement le sujet de cette maniere.

Edit : mais jai pas tout lu, et en diagonale comme dit egalement. Je ne saisi peut etre pas encore la nuance voulue.

[–] Melyssandre@jlai.lu 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
[–] Melyssandre@jlai.lu 4 points 5 months ago

je ne peux qu'approuver et malheureusement etre 1000% d'accord.
Les mauvaises experiences du genre sont legions avec ce genre d'etiquettes.

[–] Melyssandre@jlai.lu 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

je me sens potentiellement concernee 😁

"la moindre" : a definir.

[–] Melyssandre@jlai.lu 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)

Je dois avouer que le titre me gene quand meme, est ce une erreur de trad ou pas, je ne sais pas.

Mais en survolant le document, on voit bien que le terme "transsexuel" est utilise pour parler des personnes transgenres.
C'est un terme que l'on a tendance a ne pas aimer dans la commu trans.

Je me met cela de cote pour plus tards neanmoins. J'ai limpression que ce serait dommage de passer a cote.

Je reviendrai commenter plus tard 😆

PS : A bas les terfs.

[–] Melyssandre@jlai.lu 3 points 5 months ago

Versailles honore la bonne époque.

J'ai bien peur que l'État de la France ne puisse qu'empirer, quand on voit du DarmaChiottes, RetailleMerde etc

[–] Melyssandre@jlai.lu 3 points 5 months ago

Malheureusement... Puis ça dépend aussi pas mal des tribunaux aussi. Celui de Versailles est bien malheureusement représentatif dune époque passée sur bien des sujets.

[–] Melyssandre@jlai.lu 3 points 6 months ago

Pauvres racistes, pauvres xenos, pauvres transphobes, les pauvres 😐

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-oLzVFKA_U

[–] Melyssandre@jlai.lu 2 points 6 months ago (6 children)

Il yaura plus de mondes pour etre responsable de l'irresponsabilitee des deux roues et donc dilluer la charge financiere des assureurs sur les automobilistes ?

 
1
Home | Witnessing the Gaza War (witnessing-the-gaza-war.com)
 

cross-posted from: https://jlai.lu/post/13321355

cross-posted from: https://jlai.lu/post/13321354

Regarding the Author and This Document

This document was written out of a profound sense of responsibility and commitment to addressing the ongoing humanitarian and political crisis in Gaza. I, Lee Mordechai, a historian working at an Israeli university and an Israeli citizen, wrote it by drawing on my professional expertise and moral obligation to examine and document the unfolding events. Based on my experience conducting rigorous research and critical analysis, I have undertaken this work as both a citizen compelled to respond to the actions of his government and an academic determined to uphold human rights and ethical principles.

The creation of this document stems from a belief that silence in the face of injustice is unacceptable. In an atmosphere where dissenting voices are rare, this work seeks to bear witness to the immense suffering on the ground and to offer an account grounded in evidence and transparency, to the best of my ability. It reflects my conviction in synthesizing scholarly rigor and ethical responsibility when addressing events of such profound consequences for the present and future between the river and the sea.

Structured as both a public statement and an archive, this document aims to make sense of a deeply complex and troubling situation. It compiles evidence from reliable sources, including humanitarian organizations, investigative reports, and firsthand accounts, to provide a nuanced understanding of the war’s impact. At its core, this is an attempt to preserve a record for those who seek clarity and insight amidst the conflicting narratives in public discourse.

Written in a measured and factual tone, the document avoids emotional language, instead allowing the evidence to speak for itself. With this document I hope to contribute meaningfully to public discourse on this conflict and encourage readers to engage thoughtfully with its human and historical dimensions.

This work is an act of bearing witness—a reflection of my commitment to justice, accountability, and the ethical responsibility of ensuring that such stories are told and preserved. I invite readers to critically examine the evidence and consider the moral and political questions the current situation raises.

1
Home | Witnessing the Gaza War (witnessing-the-gaza-war.com)
 

cross-posted from: https://jlai.lu/post/13321354

Regarding the Author and This Document

This document was written out of a profound sense of responsibility and commitment to addressing the ongoing humanitarian and political crisis in Gaza. I, Lee Mordechai, a historian working at an Israeli university and an Israeli citizen, wrote it by drawing on my professional expertise and moral obligation to examine and document the unfolding events. Based on my experience conducting rigorous research and critical analysis, I have undertaken this work as both a citizen compelled to respond to the actions of his government and an academic determined to uphold human rights and ethical principles.

The creation of this document stems from a belief that silence in the face of injustice is unacceptable. In an atmosphere where dissenting voices are rare, this work seeks to bear witness to the immense suffering on the ground and to offer an account grounded in evidence and transparency, to the best of my ability. It reflects my conviction in synthesizing scholarly rigor and ethical responsibility when addressing events of such profound consequences for the present and future between the river and the sea.

Structured as both a public statement and an archive, this document aims to make sense of a deeply complex and troubling situation. It compiles evidence from reliable sources, including humanitarian organizations, investigative reports, and firsthand accounts, to provide a nuanced understanding of the war’s impact. At its core, this is an attempt to preserve a record for those who seek clarity and insight amidst the conflicting narratives in public discourse.

Written in a measured and factual tone, the document avoids emotional language, instead allowing the evidence to speak for itself. With this document I hope to contribute meaningfully to public discourse on this conflict and encourage readers to engage thoughtfully with its human and historical dimensions.

This work is an act of bearing witness—a reflection of my commitment to justice, accountability, and the ethical responsibility of ensuring that such stories are told and preserved. I invite readers to critically examine the evidence and consider the moral and political questions the current situation raises.

 

Regarding the Author and This Document

This document was written out of a profound sense of responsibility and commitment to addressing the ongoing humanitarian and political crisis in Gaza. I, Lee Mordechai, a historian working at an Israeli university and an Israeli citizen, wrote it by drawing on my professional expertise and moral obligation to examine and document the unfolding events. Based on my experience conducting rigorous research and critical analysis, I have undertaken this work as both a citizen compelled to respond to the actions of his government and an academic determined to uphold human rights and ethical principles.

The creation of this document stems from a belief that silence in the face of injustice is unacceptable. In an atmosphere where dissenting voices are rare, this work seeks to bear witness to the immense suffering on the ground and to offer an account grounded in evidence and transparency, to the best of my ability. It reflects my conviction in synthesizing scholarly rigor and ethical responsibility when addressing events of such profound consequences for the present and future between the river and the sea.

Structured as both a public statement and an archive, this document aims to make sense of a deeply complex and troubling situation. It compiles evidence from reliable sources, including humanitarian organizations, investigative reports, and firsthand accounts, to provide a nuanced understanding of the war’s impact. At its core, this is an attempt to preserve a record for those who seek clarity and insight amidst the conflicting narratives in public discourse.

Written in a measured and factual tone, the document avoids emotional language, instead allowing the evidence to speak for itself. With this document I hope to contribute meaningfully to public discourse on this conflict and encourage readers to engage thoughtfully with its human and historical dimensions.

This work is an act of bearing witness—a reflection of my commitment to justice, accountability, and the ethical responsibility of ensuring that such stories are told and preserved. I invite readers to critically examine the evidence and consider the moral and political questions the current situation raises.

view more: ‹ prev next ›