ManualOverride

joined 6 months ago
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/24607059

As I seem to encounter quite a few anarchists who just love to produce word salad, here's some grandmotherly words of advice. When you want to create a better world and you do so by writing, learn how to write in a way that is accessible. The people you are trying to reach might not have time to work through pages of word salad. The language you write in might not be their native language. They might not have any academic education. They might be dyslexic or have a short attention span.

It is tempting to use long words and sentences. You might be concerned that if you write in a simple way people will think your message is not true, or that your philosophy lacks depth, or even worse that someone else could think you are stupid. But in the worst case people will think none of those things because they can't be arsed to read beyond the first few words of your text in the first place, and will immediately move on to something more easy to read. Also, there's a big difference between Trump-level populism and accessible texts with substance.

Accessible texts with substance point towards some activity people can do in real life, some change they can bring about by doing a specific thing. Nobody cares if Anarcho-Capitalism or Anarcho-Coprophilism is better, but you can convince people to buy at a small grocery instead of a big supermarket. Don't tell them they should engage in mutual aid - instead give them ideas about how to help their neighbours.

I'm as guilty as the next person when it comes to posing as a smartass - but I try to fight it, because talking to each other to be heard is better than being very clever while nobody understands what we actually want to do.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The research article cited by Ajit Niranjan is worth consulting directly, because a concept brought up by Berland and Leroutier, the researchers, that hasn't been worked into the Guardian article is intersectionality.

Indeed climate change is a systemic issue which requires systemic solutions therefore focusing on what we as individuals can do is shortsighted. However, it's also important not to discount the part individuals play, collectively, in the systems that power the climate crisis. I believe observing the disparity whereby men consume more due to their consumption habits is fascinating! Why do men consume in ways that are more damaging to the environment? Perhaps the corporations producing the vast majority of carbon emissions are actually capitalizing off of the gender dynamics in our society by marketing meat and cars as manly. In doing so, they increase profits, and we all suffer the environmental and social consequences.

To paint an accurate picture of the mechanisms leading to humanities carbon emissions, it's important not to discount the role of power structures that are seemingly unrelated at first glance. More often than not, those power structures are used by the instigators of the climate crisis.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

It'd be great to have a user setting deactivating it permanently. It keeps turning back on for me ...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hey grrgyle, I love "soy on the bean"!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm glad Emma Roth, the author of the verge article, included a resource listing alternatives to the challenge: https://hcpl.net/blogs/post/alternatives-to-nanowrimo/

 

To bring some activity to this community beyond the writing club, here's a guide on how to use dashes and hyphens. Do you use these in your own writing?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'll take [action for slim chance of success] over [inaction for guaranteed failure] every time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I don't get all these "geo-engineering" magic bullets. Capitalists are taking carbon out of the ground and putting it into the air and oceans. The carbon in the air leads to warming, and the carbon in the ocean leads to acidification. Both of these things are disastrous. We need to stop the capitalists. Leave the carbon in the ground, where it belongs. Simple as

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Awesome! I wouldn't call this "releasing moisture" though which, to me, implies a physical change. It's straight up providing the activation energy for a chemical decomposition.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Of course! I overlooked the medium which, as you've well explained, lends itself nicely to exposition. I very much enjoyed reading your reply, learning about the advantages of writing for games. Thank you

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I wonder if any judge/jury is going to find the large oil conglomerates liable for trillions in damages.

Liable for destroying our world (and for what?)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I’ve started a rough website for my indie/smol/fedi/etc web presence, linked in my profile.

Cool! I'll check it out.

Thanks, @[email protected], for taking the time to organize this club! I really appreciate it.

 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/19147969

Rhiannon Firth touches on many aspects of how anarchism and disaster response are related. Seems like it'd be right up y'all's alley.

A transcription of the podcast has been published in the anarchist library this week: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/rhiannon-firth-igdcast-mobilising-disaster-relief?v=1741035078 Thanks to whomever uploaded the transcription.

 

Rhiannon Firth touches on many aspects of how anarchism and disaster response are related. Seems like it'd be right up y'all's alley.

A transcription of the podcast has been published in the anarchist library this week: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/rhiannon-firth-igdcast-mobilising-disaster-relief?v=1741035078 Thanks to whomever uploaded the transcription.

 

As I'm sure most of my multi-lingual peers feel, I hate youtube's recent addition of automatic AI dubbing on certain videos. It's enabled for some videos that are in a language different from your youtube account's setting.

This also goes for the automatic title translation. Show me everything in its original language, PLEASE!

I understand more than one language, you don't need to translate everything to the single language setting I have. The auto-dubbing should be set to OFF BY DEFAULT. At least give me the option to opt out of it. There's nothing more annoying than having to wait for a video to load, only to have to restart it back in its original language as soon as I realize the dubbing is active.

 

A radio? A knife? A lighter? A flashlight? How do the contents of your go-bag help you when your local disasters happen?

 

Do you use a style guide when editing your works? Which one?

The only general english style guide I'm familiar with is Strunk and White's The Elements of Style. Unfortunately, I hear that the authors made some, frankly, glaring linguistic mistakes. To substitute it, I've been recommended On Writing Well by Zinsser.

What is your opinion of both of these and of other guides?

view more: next ›