The old yeet ze child into the flames so the crops would grow better.
It's a bold move cotton, how many babies/children to bring back the bee population do you think?
LifeInMultipleChoice
joined 2 years ago
Maybe someone is stabbing a potato with a fork and putting it in there fore 7 minutes. Not sure.
It's estimated that 20% (1 in 5) orphans go straight to being homeless at 18. Homelessness is becoming illegal. Banning abortions ups the number of orphans... Which ups the homeless population, which in turn will up the incarceration numbers.
Our plan to fix any of it? To make cuts to social services.
I remember Bush had withdrawal plan he started putting in action, then Obama had one, then Trump had one, then Biden had one
Got it. So what's the order. Lick coaster drink shot of tequila bite lime? Or bite lime, drink tequila shot then lick coaster.
I'm curious to see what Iran would have become in the next 5 years had this shit not occurred. It had the potential of becoming another regime or possibly a democracy again. Hard to say where it was going.
Basic premise though was crude oil sells at $75 per barrell, the US averaged 4.5 million Barrells a day in 2024 (exports). If the cost per barrel dropped to $65 a barrell that's a $16.5 billion dollars lost per year. That's 66x the amount of money Elon spent to assist Trump in winning the election.
So it makes sense to pay millions or a few hundred million from oil executives to ensure oil prices stay where they are.
Nah made sense to ask, I cropped it like shit so it didn't have other phone screen on it, should have done better.
The lifting costs by country (US dollar/barrel). The UK has the highest lifting costs, therefore must sell oil at the lowest profit margins if they sell at a global price match. The lower the lifting costs, the higher margin for profit.
Okay, so it would be near (possibly already) impossible to develop another party in the U.S. and get members inserted in enough states to be on the ballot for the U.S. presidency if there is a vote in 2028. It is possible to vote every member of the congress out by 2028. (Not quite all of the Senate, statistically 2/3rds).
So which is easier to do, make a new party and split the progressives from the centrists and give a guaranteed win to the Republicans, or vote in progressive Congress/Senators and ensure people vote in the primaries to not allow the less progressive ones be the only members on the ballot.
That said. If you believe there won't be a legitimate vote again, then there is no reason to even think about democrats at this point. They haven't controlled Congress since 2009 and Shumer is considered progressive by no one. (He can be voted out in 2028 as well if people show up to primaries).
Whichever president/VP came in would place the new executive branch positions. Then the issue is just the courts.
203
Decided I would try using Steam on PopOS.. I didn't realize how long it has been since I've apparently played a steam game
(lemmy.world)
Recent games: 2016...
136
view more: next ›
Not to mention China seems to choose the most economical decision it seems. They care about Taiwan strictly because of money. There is no economic growth for them from fighting the U.S.