Landrin201

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I love the video of the British dude absolutely losing his shit about it, then picking up the controller and continuing to play

Like he screamed and cried for 3 minutes about pronouns then went ahead and kept playing the game he was calling evil and boring

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

Because Google has gotten the law steuctured such that THEY aren't liable for false advertisements they host and serve.

If I posted an ad that was blatantly false on Google, legally I'm the one liable, not Google.

It's ass backwards, Google should be on the hook for this and should have to curate advertisements. Especially when so any of them are not just fake but are openly malicious

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Up until now companies have been getting away with this because of "user agreements." Nobody has had the money and interest to get them in court.

I don't see any possible way this survives a lawsuit, for exactly the reason you said. This is almost certainly not legal but nobody has had a reason to get precedent to say it until now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The obvious rebuttal to that is that it is in the financial interest not to detect false installs because the developer will owe them money for those. Why would ANYONE trust their word on this?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago

OK this article is infuriating, as is the product it's hyping up.

If 2.5% of our emissions is going toward feeding 4 billion people then I'm totally fine with letting those emissions continue. This isn't a thing we need to "solve," this reeks of a capitalist looking at graphs of our emissions and going "we could cut emissions by 1% here and not have to actually change our habits at all!" This isn't the problem causing climate change.

The energy sector accounts for over 70% of our emissions. Instead of trying to stop emitting less than 1% by pouring money into genetically manipulating plants to need less fertilizer, why don't we instead cut 30% or more by replacing coal plants with solar, wind, and nuclear power?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is the "commie" in the room with you now? This is an unhinged level of angrv to get over a really quite tame comment.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In what universe have corruption and lying not been rampant in "the west" over the last hundred years? Did you just pull this comment out of a book titled "Red Scare Propaganda?"

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I disagree with this take. I live in NOVA. What happened in the last gubernatorial race was that the democrats ran the worst campaign I have ever seen. It was so bad that democratic turnout wasn't high enough to beat the Republicans. That's it.

If they democrats had run a halfway competent campaign then they would have handily won.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And don't forget the colonies of puerto Rico and Guam

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago (4 children)

My fiancee and I both got artificial sapphires in our engagement rings.

Real ones were nearly double the price.

You wouldn't know they're lab grown. They look great.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

OK, then why fucking make them? Aren't games supposed to be fun?

This whole genre really bugs me, and I'm someone who LOVES space games. The best game in the genre IMO is elite dangerous, because their ship to ship combat is so damn fun to play that I can hop in for a bit and have a blast without having to engage with the other systems that are often painfully boring.

The problem here is that people what the feeling of being explorers and finding new things, but video games inherently can't provide that. There aren't computers strong enough to produce thousands or millions of planets that all have genuinely interesting features on them that are worth exploring for. "Exploration" in current space Sims is basically "stick your name on something someone else hasn't already stuck their name on, maybe grab some resources from it, and leave." That gets dull very fast.

Developers COULD choose instead to make a couple of good, big planets that are interesting and full of actually good content. They could give you a reason to explore beyond "look other planets cool."

If you made 1000 planets and only 10 of them are at all interesting, and your game is centered on exploring other planets and not really focussed on much else, you've made a boring game.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

It got us so much good will that the French still ban us from wearing religious garments in public, and antisemitic attacks across Europe have been increasing steadily for at least 20 years, with governments seemingly unable to do anything about it.

If you "recognize your roots" but changed your name and also have spent your entire lifetime attempting to murder your parents and grandparents, I think it's fair to say that you don't respect or care about your roots.

 

I think she's a solid choice, curious to see how she does!

 

When I make a new post in the app, the icon to click to post the post is a plus sign. Can that get switched to the paper airplane icon you see in most other social media apps for posting something? I think that's kind of become the standard...

 

We have 2 cats and 2 dogs. You've seen 3 of them now.

 

Hello! I've recently been getting into bird watching, and would like to start photographing more of the birds I see. I have been getting some good shots with my camera through my office window, but if I want to do more than that my equipment currently is pretty limited.

My Camera is a Nikon D5100, and I've had it for ages- I love this camera. I have a 55-200mm lens on it that I got way back when I got this camera, but that's a very limiting range- 200mm really isn't enough to do a lot of bird photography.

I know that when I get a better lens, it will likely be large enough to warrant a better tripod than what I currently have and possibly even a gimbal mount (though, that may be a future upgrade).

So, those are the things I want recommendations for- telephoto lenses that will fit my camera, a good tripod, and gimbal mounts. I can't break the bank, I know this will be VERY hard for good telephoto lenses but I'd like to stay under $800 for the lens if at all possible- that way I can upgrade sooner rather than later, the tripod and gimbal can be future upgrades I save up for. I'd like a tripod that will last me a good long time and is quite sturdy- the one I currently have is pretty cheap, and while it's sturdy enough for now I don't think it will do a good job with a heavy lens beyond a 200mm focal length.

Thanks!

 

Title says it all; I was uploading some images to post and got a rate limit error. I'm assuming that means there is a limit to how often you can upload images, but searching around I wasn't able to find what that limit is. Does anyone have any documentation on that?

 

Our DM uses cards which add a special effect on critical success and critical failure. Some of them are benign, some of them are severe.

There are 4 of us in the group. We walk into the room, and the mind flayer immediately stunlocks 3 of us. My character is a Loxodon Cleric built like a tank, but he can't break the stun because I keep getting shit rolls.

On its next turn, the mind flayer runs over to me. It goes to reach out its tentacle attack which will flay my mind and make me its slave... and crit fails. Crit fails with advantage.

The card that got drawn for the crit fail made it injure its tentacles on my armor. That may not have been a problem, except that they got injured in such a way that they could not be used until the next long rest. Think, like, breaking an arm, or something. But that meant that ALL of the flayer's most dangerous attacks were now unusable.

So we fucking thrashed it in the next turn, because it was completely defenseless. In our world these monsters are extraordinarily rare and most people wouldn't even know they exist- when we brought its body back to the wizard in town he FREAKED OUT and we were just like "yeah this weird tentacle monster was there, it acted like it was a big deal or something but it died when we breathed at it with no problem at all."

 

She came with the name when we rescued her. We call her Ethel most of the time.

 

This is now the SECOND time reddit has given me a 7 day ban for report abuse, and it's the second time the ban was total bullshit.

Both came for reporting content in r/Ukraine which had hit the front page. The first ban was for reporting a comment which used the word "orc" to describe Russian people multiple times and was, at least in my opinion, doing so in a clearly racially charged way. I actually got banned from the subreddit for commenting in that thread- someone was asking what orc meant and I said "it's a dehumanizing term being used right now for Russian people." Then I got the full-site ban. The admins lifted the ban when I appealed it. That comment has since been deleted.

This latest time was for reporting the literal beheading video that hit the front page. It was explicitly against reddit TOS.

I regularly report content in other subreddits that is openly racist or ridiculously, over the top gorey. Never once have I gotten hit was a "report abuse" ban. Why the fuck is there even a "report abuse" ban in the first place? How does it work? It seems to me like the mods of a subreddit can claim that a post or comment is having reports abused on it and the admins will just blanket ban everyone who reported it. Or is that just true for this particular subreddit?

I already wasn't using Reddit because of the blackout, now they may have just made me never want to return even if they do cave on third party apps. This is just ridiculous.

 

He's a full-bred Bernese Mountain Dog, he's a real sweetie.

view more: ‹ prev next ›