JWBananas

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Would you look at that, all of the words in your comment are made of letters.

I have checked 1,599,379,698 comments, and only 302,533 of them were made of letters.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Thank you, JWBananas, for voting on Anti-ThisBot-IB.

This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. You can view results here.

Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (9 children)

Hey there JWBananas! If you agree with someone else's comment, please leave an upvote instead of commenting "THIS"! By upvoting instead, the original comment will be pushed to the top and be more visible to others, which is even better! Thanks! :)


I am a bot! If you have any feedback, please send me a message! More info:

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago (10 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I didn't fucking tag you in my original post. I don't even know how you found it in the first place. If this is how the fediverse works, that's not good.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (5 children)

@TechConnectify I think you're missing the part where I didn't like the content, and I don't like you personally, and I unsubscribed. Please stop spamming me.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

As of this moment, the post has:

  • 87 points on beehaw.org
  • 55/38 on kbin.social
  • 61 points on midwest.social
  • 62 points on programming.dev

The real question is if downvotes on other instances federate back to Beehaw (i.e. did they only hide the button, or did they truly block them?)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (12 children)

That's great that you found something that worked for you and for others. And I respect your stance on cost.

But it doesn't change the fact that an experiment that only runs through the pre-wash cycle is at best misleading when the results that are important are that of the full cycle. And it also doesn't change my impression that you used a fundamentally flawed experiment to try to make a logical argument, which was then contradicted in your follow-up.

It's just not a great look.

If the point of the second video was "I was wrong" (versus "I'm still right but for different reasons") then I probably wouldn't have unsubscribed. Your moving of the goalposts (which just triggers too many memories of growing up with narcissists) just confirms that was a good choice.

But I do like your content about LED holiday lights, and I will be back to see what you find this season.

For what it's worth, adding a little citric acid should be more cost effective than putting more detergent in the prewash cup.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (22 children)

I came for the traffic signals. I cringed through the overly-long CED saga. I left after the dishwashers.

I'll still pop in seasonally though, for the latest on proper LED holiday lights.


Dishwashing video #1: Detergent pods must be bad, because dishwashers have a pre-wash dispenser. So if you use pods, you aren't using enough detergent!

Here's my demonstration of how using detergent during pre-wash results in more cleaning occurring during pre-wash (which, you know, isn't the full cycle and isn't how people use dishwashers).

Dishwashing video #2: Actually, I was totally wrong. But detergent pods are still bad, because they result in using too much detergent and are wasteful!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Kbin.social is having issues today

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Gilbert Gottfried

view more: ‹ prev next ›