Be right back, need to go get a PhD so that I can understand this.
Hypnoctopus
joined 2 years ago
NO! I REFUSE TO BELIEVE IT! (WARIO STYLE "MMEEEEEEEHHHHHH") (runs away).
and the same people complaining about the same people constantly complaining about reposts that most of the community haven’t seen 🙄
"nobody ever talks about this"
This has been talked about a lot.
What exactly does acceptance look like to you? He was offered a contract, gave it a thumbs up, and delivered the goods for the price specified in the contract. It would be ridiculous NOT to treat that as accepting the contract.
Will you clarify: "He was offered a contract, gave it a thumbs up, and delivered the goods for the price specified in the contract."?
The article says he didn't deliver the goods for the price after sending a thumbs up.
According to the article:
"Mickleborough said the emoji amounted to an agreement because he had texted numerous contracts to Achter, who previously confirmed through text message and always fulfilled the order."
It does not say he accepted any contracts in the past using that emoji. It says that according to the guy who sued him, he has accepted contracts through text message.
Yes, I read it. Did you? It said:
"Mickleborough said the emoji amounted to an agreement because he had texted numerous contracts to Achter, who previously confirmed through text message and always fulfilled the order."
It does not say that the argument was made that he previously agreed to a contract through text message _ by sending a single 👍_.
This is the context we have through the article, and so no, a single emoji as a binding contract is ridiculous.
There's always this guy who's like, aCtchUaLLy....
You just said admitted to pirating, you little muppet.
It is completely absurd to rule an emoji as an agreement to a contract.
I find it comical how it ends in a period and not an exclamation point. Such a dry delivery by Zelda.