this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
249 points (98.1% liked)

World News

36693 readers
698 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago (10 children)

It is completely absurd to rule an emoji as an agreement to a contract.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Everything needs proper context. We shouldn't make decisions based on headlines.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Yes, I read it. Did you? It said:

"Mickleborough said the emoji amounted to an agreement because he had texted numerous contracts to Achter, who previously confirmed through text message and always fulfilled the order."

It does not say that the argument was made that he previously agreed to a contract through text message _ by sending a single 👍_.

This is the context we have through the article, and so no, a single emoji as a binding contract is ridiculous.

load more comments (8 replies)