GunnarRunnar

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's more like a default platform seeing as even former PlayStation exclusives are slowly getting a PC release as well. And I did call Starfield Xbox/PC exclusive, not just Xbox.

It's probably not the word to describe what's getting released where and stems from marketing but it's commonly used in gaming so most understand its meaning.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Why do people behave as if Starfield was the first game not released on PlayStation?

Who is doing that? It's just blatantly obvious that it would've been released on PlayStation without Microsoft meddling and their games sell a shitload, I mean Skyrim has been chugging along over a decade now. So I'm not really sure how Starfield is irrelevant to Ms buying shit conversation.

It's not what being an exclusive means (let not get into linguistics here, I mean strictly the gaming industry term). I agree this specific case was anticompetitive but framing it as an exclusive just weakens this point in my opinion and allows to shift the debate away from it.

Away from what? Everyone knows what it means -- or maybe I don't, please enlighten me in that case.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So I don't remember where but I'd heard about Microsoft wanting to buy Nintendo long time ago. The suits are always spitballing.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 years ago (5 children)

And funnily enough Starfield being Xbox/PC exclusive is an example why their hoarding is bad for gaming, and why the Activision deal shouldn't pass.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

40 second load times are pretty dreadful in a genre that by design has a lot of them.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Microsoft is a good underdog because they have infinite money. And a really bad market leader, I bet worse than Sony. It would've been way better for the industry to not let them acquire the big boys they have.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

They hired the right dude for that job.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Fuck off. The tech got popular and public got educated on what makes it work.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It was kinda ambiguous how deep they were going to stick it up the devs' ass.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago (8 children)

I'm still on my Bing diet from Google but they'd be an easy recommend if the search didn't suck ass. I'm not saying Google is that good either, equally bad on most cases, but from time to time I still need Google's help because they're getting me closer to what I want than Bing.

But sure, focus on spammy, intrusive ads straight in the OS. Fucking idiots. I don't understand how they think they'll win that war without improving the product. I hate the AI as well because I can't trust it.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 years ago

It definitely is a different story when your (presumably) really good friend with industry connections is a piece of shit compared to just doing the right thing without risking anything, even getting praise for it. He's just a human with maybe less than average integrity who did good when it suited him. Who can really say why they wrote the letter.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago

Throw him in jail.

view more: ‹ prev next ›