Flisty

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

@k0e3 @Wanpieserino depends on the type, but in Europe it's only legally an ebike if the battery only assists pedalling - no throttle, no working if you're not pedalling - and cuts out after 15.5mph/25kph (anything more is a motorbike). So it takes the edge off hills, helps at junctions etc, but you're still going to have to work while on it. https://www.bikeradar.com/advice/fitness-and-training/electric-bike-fitness
Also it takes away that initial "ugh I can't be bothered, I'll drive" so you end up cycling more in general.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

@Boddhisatva @vividspecter there was massive voter suppression this election. It's been mounting for ages but even worse this time. Loads of mail-ins chucked out; bomb threats; voter roll purges. A lot of people tried to vote (or even now, think they did) but were turned away or their votes weren't counted. Even on those numbers, things look sticky for Trump. https://www.gregpalast.com/trump-lost-vote-suppression-won/

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

@daddy32 @aesthelete yup I'm sure it's worth quite a lot to some larger private investors

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

@Viskio_Neta_Kafo I assume it's big data corpus linguistics; each word/phrase is assigned an identifier and then compared to the corpora the LLM holds to see what words are commonly grouped. Linguists have used corpora for decades to quantitatively analyse language; here are some open ones https://www.english-corpora.org/ - the LLM I assume identifies the likely lang "type" to choose a good corpus, identifies question tags & words in key positions, finds common response structures and starts building.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

@barneypiccolo @Prandom_returns probably need to settle on some nice succinct nicknames for everyone involved, a la Sleepy Joe / Lyin' Ted...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

@barneypiccolo @Bamboodpanda really gives you confidence that they all know what they're doing in the databases to make sure "everything's computer" in the federal agencies

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

@dogslayeggs I know you were only talking about cars. My point is you can't only think about cars because there are too many other factors, including drivers of other cars who don't know whether or not they can go if the other "driver" doesn't indicate whether they've seen them or not. It's not about "banning people for not waving", it's that if someone doesn't let the other person through, nobody moves. The endpoint will be everyone hating Waymos and always going first.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

@dogslayeggs this is not a good solution unless you're expecting to mandate that all pedestrians, cyclists, scooter riders, guide dogs, whatever, wear them too, and that all existing cars are retrofitted with them. Kind of dystopian.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

@Aux I'd call it "predictably unpredictable"! Plus the "cyclist swerving round a pothole" roulette.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (5 children)

@ripcord unpredictable but maybe not standard practice? Just a guess, could be a bad assumption! British driving culture is reliant on eye contact and waves and nods and flashes - you have to signal if you're giving way (to other drivers as well), and say thank you; lots of places where there's only room for one vehicle on a two way road and someone has to decide who's going. Might be my failure of imagination but I don't know how that works with no driver.

view more: ‹ prev next ›