Eldritch

I qualify as a communist, why would I be pushing anti-communist propaganda. I'm simply pointing out your hypocrisy and the hypocrisy of leninism. You're not a communist.

Her disqualification is her qualification.

Nice strawman you got there. This has nothing to do with what I believe or don't believe Beyond I believe people should have a right to self-determination. I realize that childish leninists are so cock sure and think they know better. Wanting to force their own backward beliefs on everyone else. As much as these Tibetan Monks do. Two wrongs don't make a right.

And I mean as someone coming from a leninist instance it's extremely hilarious that you act as if not having political representation is a bad thing. Political representation actual political representation is denied to wide swaths of people under a Vanguard.

Regarding your laughable whataboutism. I absolutely believe that Guam should be given the right to vote for president if they desire and that the United States should recognize them. Hey quick question when is China going to give the Uyghurs the right to self-determination and to vote? Oh oh that's right, China gave up the right to vote for president completely.

Not at all. The fact of the matter is many of the people in that region and culture View things differently than you and I do. If they gave people the option to relocate and escape the reach of this monastery. You honestly wouldn't see many people take it. Which is more or less the point. All this may sound horrific to you and i. As does tribal body mutilation etc. But to those tribes and cultures it is part of their culture.

You literally implied that women fighting for the right to be included everywhere. Was about supremacy. That feminism is about supremacy. Your own words. Read your previous post. Perhaps you misspoke. But I don't think so. And neither did most of the other people reading.

If China actually cared about the people. Rather than forcing the monastery closed and them to abandon their religion/culture. They would simply offer to relocate them away from the monastery if they feared for their children.

Without children and followers to harness. The religion would die on its own. Even as the general culture would endure. China explicitly does not want that. China specifically is trying to oppress and eradicate cultural differences.

People are 100% Justified to call China out on this. And in doing so are not defending all of tibet's actions. Two things can be wrong at the same time. All sides can be wrong at the same time. This is one of those cases. There is no defense of China or Tibet here. China is not doing this out of some goodness of their heart or humanitarian need. Simply their own selfish goals.

So colonialism/imperialism is okay? Either it is or it isn't. All I'm asking for is consistency.

It's 100% possible to find beliefs and practices of cults and cultures to be abhorrent. But also acknowledge that trying to forcefully change things. Almost invariably backfires. As well as undermining any moral stance you may have once had.

Or other "western" nations. I've never knowingly met someone staunchly ml. That was from an area formerly or currently ml.

Talking to someone from China etc you generally will not hear them specifically shit on their government. Mostly because the government will come knocking and threatening violence as they did with Naomi. But you will catch them nervously deflecting to justifying it. Acknowledging it without speaking of it. Though even that could not save Naomi.

Hilariously Lemmy.ml is blocked in China. Where a lot of other Lemmy instances aren't strictly.

Huh, I genuinely consume more British TV than I do US TV. And I'm well aware and familiar with someone getting "shot dead". That's clear. But putting the subject after the description just sorry of jackknifes the temporal understanding. Mayor shot dead. "Oh they were killed" Vs shot dead mayor "why are they shooting a corpse".

I mean, I guess dead is an adjective. Which is often used before a subject to describe it. So grammatically it's "correct". If obtuse. But then I'm sure there are phrasings Americans use like that.

The headline gore is real.

Ought, but when someone has a monopoly on violence. Whose going to enforce it against the person with the monopoly?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semitic_people

Being anti-semitic means being against any of them. Not just the jews. This whole Canard of it being just only against Jews is a Zionist redefinition.