Edo78

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Per adesso ho preso rock'n'roll robots ma temo che per la bimba di 7 anni sia decisamente troppo complesso e possa risultare noioso, anche solo giocando con una 11enne e un 16enne sarebbe svantaggiata e se giocassimo anche noi adulti risulterebbe troppo sbilanciato il gioco. Però mi sono piaciute un sacco le meccaniche e ci giocherò (o almeno lo proporrò) per alcune sedute ... adesso però devo mettermi a guardare anche gli altri per trovare qualcosa che sia di più ampio respiro per un grande range di età

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I want to jockely answer: curl but there are seriously good cli rss readers out there:

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

If you want a way to self host git (not github) repositories you can check this list https://www.slant.co/topics/1440/~best-self-hosted-web-based-git-repository-managers

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

https://smarthomescene.com/reviews/aqara-fp2-human-presence-sensor-review/

UPDATE 24.04.2023: Aqara has released a new firmware update 1.1.6_0005.0025 which enables local control. The FP2 can now be used without an internet connection, hub, or app dependence in Home Assistant after it’s initial setup.

So, yes, after the initial setup (you may need an internet connection to download and install the newer firmware) no internet connection is needed at all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I prefer to use services as keepa or camelcamelcamel to track price drop (besides prima days & co)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

WOW, una valanga di consigli. Grazie mille, andrò ad approfondirli tutti

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Io uso keepa per tracciare i prezzi e ricevere notifiche quando scendono sotto soglie che imposto io. Che siano i prime day o meno è irrilevante (anche se oggi un dispositivo per la domotica che avevo puntato è sceso da 80+ € a 70€ e ne ho presi 3)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

segno subito, grazie mille

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I don't think it's even possibile. How do you propose such a feature to works like? Showing all the comments from all the post known to your instance (so showing ALL the posts)?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

It wasn't meant to be a correction ... I just learned about this project so I'd just want to know more

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Are you sure about Paaster supporting Markdonw? I only see syntax highlighting https://paaster.io/GtlseaIIhqtfcsZV1C8sS#BgT9miwSaeKzMLQ-Ch6d3KZlgfCmIR32dpYr06HXYTw

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I just copy&pasted their README in chatgpt asking for a comparison (so there may be allucinations)

Both PrivateBin and Paaster are "pastebin" tools that allow users to share snippets of text or code online. Both emphasize privacy and security, encrypting data at the local level in the user's browser before sending it to the server. However, there are several key differences between the two services:

  1. Design and User Interface: While PrivateBin self-identifies as a minimalist pastebin, Paaster seems to put an emphasis on user experience, offering features like file drag & drop and a paste history.

  2. Features: Both offer basic features like password protection and the option to delete data after reading, but PrivateBin also offers features like the ability to have anonymous or nicknamed discussions, Markdown formatting support, code syntax highlighting, and the ability to upload files. On the other hand, Paaster offers a paste history feature, PWA support, and i18n.

  3. Trust: PrivateBin warns users not to blindly trust the server administrator, whereas Paaster advises users to either host their service or use a trusted hosting service.

  4. Implementation and Maintenance: Paaster seems more developer-oriented, with API documentation, a CLI tool, and support for Vercel and Docker. PrivateBin, however, also has a developer and installation guide.

  5. Hosting Options: Paaster seems more geared towards self-hosting, with detailed instructions for use with Docker and options for use with external storage services like Amazon S3 and Google Cloud Storage. PrivateBin does not provide specific hosting details in the provided text.

  6. Security: Both use end-to-end encryption, but they use different encryption algorithms. Paaster uses XChaCha20-Poly1305, while PrivateBin uses 256-bit AES in Galois Counter mode.

These are just some of the key differences between the two services. Both have their strengths and unique points, and the choice between the two will depend on the specific needs of the user or organization.

view more: ‹ prev next ›