Got it, just to be clear I read Kon-Tiki in 8th grade and hadn’t followed up on my knowledge since, I didn’t realize it was racist pseudoscience (but in hindsight I totally see that)
CleverOleg
Notice that all these offers of recognizing a Palestinian state (which I should point out, should not even be up for debate since the State of Palestine was created with Israel by the UN in 1948) all include “if Hamas disarms”. This is a non-starter, it’s basically them dangling a little carrot to accept Israel’s “offer”. If Hamas disarms then it’s likely the entire population of Gaza will be removed at best, and murdered down to the last child at worst. Also, recognition is nice but isn’t worth much. Israel and the US don’t give a single care if the entire world recognizes a Palestinian state, they still won’t. It’s exactly what they do with the blockade of Cuba. The whole world tells them to stop, and the US just gives the world the finger.
I think images of starving kids make these politicians feel a little heat. So they are making an offer they know Hamas cannot and will not accept to save face.
And regarding annexation… the situation of who holds what is quite murky right now. Maps say one thing, but I don’t think the IOF is much able to hold on to anywhere close to that much ground. And meaningful annexation i.e. bringing in settlers… that is not possible. Not without a lot of dead settlers. Israel abandoned Gaza for a reason. I don’t see how Israel could do anything more than an annexation on paper than denies use of some land to Gazans but functionally doesn’t allow Israel any more than that (though admittedly, that is still quite bad as it would pack more Gazans into a smaller area). I also get the impression the Israeli military is really looking for a way out of this, I cannot see how they would think maintain a partial annexation would be viable long term.
To be clear, I am not disagreeing with anything you are saying, just offering a different perspective.
You know what the US also gave Fallujah in addition to that aid, EliSSa? The highest rates of birth defects in the world, on account of all the depleted uranium rounds used on the people there.
This woman is definitely going to run for president and do so on nothing but Kamala’s “most lethal military in the world” comment and football metaphors.
Exactly. The only thing Macron was offering (presumably Starmer too) was to dangle the possibility of recognizing a Palestinian state (not that France or the UK can actually make that a reality nor will apply any pressure to do so) IF the Resistance accepts all of Israel’s terms, which amount to total capitulation and disarmament, leaving Gaza totally defenseless.
I’ve never read any of the books in Game of Thrones. But I have read Stephen King’s Dark Tower series. It’s 7 books written between roughly 1978 and 2004. First four books are great, written between 1978 and 1997. Importantly though, he only wrote those 4 books when he had the inspiration. But the 4th book was more of a flashback that didn’t really advance the story (book 3 was written in 1991, I think). So, much like Martin, fans were constantly asking King to finish the story.
And he did. He wrote books 5-7 right after each other around 2004. And you know what, it’s my opinion and not everyone agrees… but those books suck (5 is ok I guess). Not only that, but the very end of the series was written as an explicit “fuck you” to all his fans who wanted him to finish it (he said in the epilogue about how some people think sex is all about an organism and not everything before).
So he wrote when he didn’t have any inspiration for the story just to please his fans. Maybe Martin’s just lazy, sure. But I suspect he has no idea how to end it and if he tries now thr end product will be garbage.
All things serve the beam.
I like he says factual things but leaves the implication of “well of the kids are wrong because they are young and not wise and smart like us”; as if everyone didn’t know that boomer brains are fried and the entire public support for Israel has been built on lies over the decades.
Go ahead fuckface, what exactly did Mamdani get wrong that you would have “debunked”.
Edit: actually, his comment about “being pro-Palestine isn’t incompatible with being anti-Israel” is wrong. The under-40 pro-Palestine Jewish people I know all uniformly anti-Israel.
Did those who advocate for abolition of slavery have intensely detailed plans for how an economy would function post-slavery, complete with successful examples of societies that built some other economic system after slavery?
Marx and Engels spoke just enough about future socialism to provide the framework. They didn’t fill in the details because that is not possible, there is no one-size-fits all blue print for socialism. Each time and place has its own specific context that must be accounted for. Ignore that and you will likely fail.
Also, Marx and Engels whole point was to describe the history of all hitherto society, and how class struggle defines that history. To try and authoritatively say “this is the precise next step” would be undialectical and anathema to their entire approach.
I know I’m pointing out something very obvious here and that the solution isn’t so easy, but it strikes me that the solution here is to make class mobility or other improvement in material conditions possible outside of this system. Trying to just stamp it out seems like it would be very ineffective.