CM400

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Sorry, I should have been more clear…

The article made it sound like he was broadcasting from a missile impact site, condemning those that broadcast those impact sites.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

“Broadcasts that show exactly where the missiles land on the State of Israel are a danger to state security,” he said from a missile impact site in Petah Tikva on Tuesday.

???

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Florida, Louisiana, and Texas

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

According to President Donald Trump’s lawyers, the administration can simply wait until after an immigration judge has conducted the proceeding that ordinarily would determine whether a particular noncitizen may be deported to a particular country, and then, if that noncitizen is allowed to be deported, announce that the immigrant will be deported to some previously unmentioned country — even if that immigrant reasonably fears they will be tortured in that nation.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago

An excellent way to keep the streets safe. /s

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 68 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Saved you a click: she thought $1.2 billion per year over 10 years totaled more than $1trillion.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago

Sure, an argument like that could be made. I guess…

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

DHS said that in addition to barring enrollment of future international students, "existing foreign students must transfer to lose their legal status." The revocation, which DHS said was the result of "pro-terrorist conduct," was first reported by The New York Times.

What does it mean that they “must transfer to lose”? Is she saying if they transfer they lose their status and that that transfer is being forced, or that they must transfer or lose it?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Can someone explain how this wouldn’t violate the first amendment? I don’t understand the reasoning behind it.

 

There is a charity event running for the month of April, and I’ve signed up our community to participate.

Details here.

The gist of it is to comment !LemmySilver under posts or comments you think deserve attention, and at the end of the month, the users with the most awards will have money donated to a charity in their name.

Let’s spread some positivity in this c/, and good luck!

view more: next ›