AcidicBasicGlitch

joined 3 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Huh, so that's an odd thing to do anytime, but especially given that on Friday he fired a board member on the federal agency that oversees nuclear reactors in America... Never thought I would have to say this, but hopefully these are unrelated to each other and only reflect his insane desire to ignore safety regulations...

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/16/us/nuclear-safety-board-firing-trump.html

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Didn't think about that. I was thinking it said "Put a" It looks like there's a gap between the t and a

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm in the United States

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

Yeesh, I'm sorry dude, that's awful. I hope you pressed charges.

I don't get why some people have to be such lame ass pieces of shit. Imagine you're drunk and surrounded by music and people just having fun, enjoying themselves and trying to mind their own business, but you just can't pass up an opportunity to be an antisemitic scumbag.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Gotta disagree with you in this particular case. Living here I see a lot of novelty sex shirts 24/7/365. Constant parties and groups of bachelor or bachelorettes. I usually don't think twice about it.

I have to give points for:

A. Originality. I've seen 'I <3 milfs' a million times before, but can't recall ever seeing this one. I imagine if Kenny Powers opened up a novelty T-shirts store in Daytona Beach, he would sell this shirt and attempt to trademark it.

B. Unexpectedness. When I first saw this, I was scrolling through several other pictures and hit this one. It was like rounding a corner and being taken by complete surprise. The randomness of the shirt combined with the person wearing it, and the look on her face, elicited a genuine "Guffaw," followed by me simply holding up my phone in response to the group of people I was with asking "What?"

It simply would have been too difficult to convey the complexity of the image into words, and all 6 people had a similar speechless reaction.

C. Rather than simply making a statement, it encourages one to really stop and think.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

They're in the French Quarter. She could be looking off camera and smirking at somebody yelling in a megaphone while telling her she's going to burn in hell, or a middle aged guy in a mustache rides t-shirt raising his cup to her bc he admires the game. Coin toss.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

Right, but this isn't that.

This is a pack of lesbians in the deep south, not giving a fuck about what anyone thinks, even as the country is being driven towards civil war by uptight fundamentalists who hate freedom.

They're out to have a good time and enjoy themselves instead of looking to everyone else to see how they can judge them and insert themselves into everyone else's business. Looks like an easy going group of freedom loving Americans with a good sense of humor.

Context matters, so pretty fucking alpha in my book 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Idk, I didn't take the picture, just saw it and felt it would be appropriate for here.

One looks like something about titties? Maybe? No idea about the other.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I actually found out it covers 5 parishes but they only had voting locations in 3, which makes the first come first serve thing even more bizarre.

The election was for one member on a board. The only reason there was an election was because a new candidate challenged the incumbent candidate, which usually never happens. Usually people remain on the board for as long as they would like to hold that position. Why this seat in particular?

The incumbent is the only board member from Orleans, and runs community gardens throughout the city, so I would argue that if anything, Orleans has a considerable amount to do with this particular election. How did the registrar even come up with that number if this is the first of its kind of election for this district?

I believe another member of the board will have a seat that can be challenged soon. If that seat is challenged, whichever Parish that board member is from hopefully gets a lot of support behind them of the people of the parish feel they're doing a good job.

Also find it a little suspicious, this guy challenging her seat is a commercial fishing captain, and recently Louisiana Republicans passed a bill to deregulate seafood safety and hand oversight to the department that controls this board.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Actually found out the district covers 5 parishes but they only had voting locations in 3.

There is a separate registrar for each parish, so who is the "official" registrar they mention in the article and how did she generate that expect around 20 voters at each location number?

[–] [email protected] 73 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

That's the thing though, is it just incompetence or is it an attempt to see what people are willing to let slide?

We definitely need a re-do bc otherwise it signals that we're ok with letting it happen again and again. Will there be enough ballots when it's time for us to vote for elections with more at stake like mayor or in the midterms?

I could see low expectations from the registrar of voters for turnout, but 60 people in the entire city? And they just didn't have any kind of plans if more showed up?

We're the first state to start using the DOGE voter database maintenance system. Will we end up with some kind of "glitch" that purges voters on top of being told the registrar made a miscalculation when estimating how many people would actually show up to vote?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

What they're supposed to start doing here (or at least they were when the last governor left office, not sure if they still will do it now that democracy is crumbling) is paper and then scan every ballot so it can also be included in recounts.

As of now with most elections in LA, it's electronic only and votes don't get included in recounts unless they're mail in.

It's not paper ballots I'm pissed about, (but like I said, it also seems like that could open up the door to more BS given what happened in the recount) it's the fact that anyone would pretend 900 ballots would be enough for the entire city, and that they had no backup plan for when they weren't.

 

Post on Mastodon

Very detailed Lemmy post I wrote about this fuckery and more

Local news article containing the quote about the voter registrar

On Homer Plessey Way, board member Daniel Milojevic stood outside the Bywater polling place in the Press Street Gallery suggesting people try the two Jefferson Parish locations.

He said the local registrar of voters gave the district only 300 ballots per location and told them they could expect about 20 people.

“We had to confirm the number of ballots weeks ago,” he said, before it was clear how high the turnout would be. Milojevic conceded that planning had clearly missed the mark.

As one astute gentleman asked while defending Reddit, and accusing me of spreading misinformation:

If hardly anybody knew, how did turnout exceed expectations within 2 hours?

Because the "expectation" provided by the registrar was literally 20 voters per location (60 voters in total) for the entire fucking city.

 

Yesterday my city held a very rare election, and most people didn't even know about until the last minute. I learned about it on Friday via this same subreddit, but the information posted only covered one of the two candidates in detail.

The brief description given for the other candidate, was also very oddly formatted and difficult to read.

It seemed odd to have such a rare and last minute election quietly scheduled the same day of the No Kings rally and Pride Festival, especially after the vote regarding the millage for the Orleans Parish Sheriff budget was criticized for being scheduled during Jazz fest.

Anyway, I got up early on Saturday a little before 6 am and found an article covering both candidates. I tried to post the article but as soon as I hit submit, the post was already removed.

Weird, I thought maybe somebody already posted the information and I must have missed it. I checked the subreddit and still didn't see it. Odd, so I tried to just post it as a text post with the information and link included, but again, it was removed as soon as I hit submit.

... Very weird, I figured I must have been temporarily suspended from posting or something, but I was still able to comment as usual, and a few hours later, when I posted something about the protest, I had no issues.

I was planning to go vote along with several other people after the No King protest. But by the time the protest was over, people were learning voters were being turned away because the voting locations were saying they ran out of ballots.

I thought that might be disinformation, so I went anyway. Confirmed that yep, I couldn't vote. The best they could offer was allowing me to add my name, phone number, and optionally who I would have voted for if I had been allowed to vote, to a list of names being collected on an unofficial sheet of spare printer paper.

New Orleans voters in rare conservation district election turned away in droves Saturday

Hundreds of New Orleans residents showed up to vote Saturday in the Crescent Soil and Water Conservation District election only to find all the available ballots had already been cast.

The race, between the incumbent, urban farmer Erica “Sage” Johnson of Orleans Parish, and Lloyd Landry IV, a commercial fishing captain from St. Charles Parish, will decide who represents the district covering Orleans, Jefferson and St. Charles parishes.

The district's five-member board works with landowners to manage resources, including water, soil, forests and wildlife. There are 44 districts across the state and they fall under the jurisdiction of the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries.

The district said ahead of the election that only 300 ballots would be available at each of the eight polling places throughout the three parishes and urged voters to come early.

Still, many arriving at the three voting locations in New Orleans as early as 9 a.m. were surprised to find the available ballots there had already run out.

Nola.com Correction: This story was changed to reflect that the conservation district falls under the Department of Agriculture and Forestry.

This actually makes this even more suspicious because Louisiana just passed a bill to deregulate seafood safety and inspection, and hand oversight of seafood regulation over to this department.

The candidate who is suddenly challenging the incumbent for her seat is a commercial fishing captain.

The incumbent also released a statement last night, addressing the vote, and said she had actually requested more ballots be made available.

The head of city council, who is also one of the top candidates for the upcoming mayoral election (if we're allowed to vote by then) has called for a do-over.

Councilwoman Helena Moreno calls for redo Soil and Water Board election

I guess we'll just have to wait and see what happens.

Here are what the official ballots looked like if anyone is interested.

A. They literally could have just given people a laptop, printer access, and a pair of scissors to make more.

B. Using these seems like it creates the risk of people just creating new votes to add on to the total tally. Especially odd given the very sheisty recount that somebody paid for using an alias, after the vote for the sheriff budget, where an official suddenly remembered some extra ballots he had forgotten about in another room.

 

Hundreds of New Orleans residents showed up to vote Saturday in the Crescent Soil and Water Conservation District election only to find all the available ballots had already been cast.

The race, between the incumbent, urban farmer Erica “Sage” Johnson of Orleans Parish, and Lloyd Landry IV, a commercial fishing captain from St. Charles Parish, will decide who represents the district covering Orleans, Jefferson and St. Charles parishes.

The district's five-member board works with landowners to manage resources, including water, soil, forests and wildlife. There are 44 districts across the state and they fall under the jurisdiction of the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries.

Interesting... 🤔

157
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

•https://toad.social/@PimentoMori/114675591725322491

What Is Truth (Live at The White House, Washington D.C., April 17, 1970)

 

"I can't help gloating over it all, I admit," Mardan said on-air on Rossia-1. "The worse it is for the United States, the better it is for us."

As Cherkasov pointed out, "Cheering over unrest in the United States is standard fare for the Kremlin and Kremlin-friendly media."

The rhetoric is well-practiced and hardly new, he added.

"These outlets have, after all, come up with surveys that purportedly show America as their country's main adversary for the last 20 years."

Much of the pro-Putin coverage that depicts the Los Angeles area as "apocalyptic," Cherkasov said.

But he noted that some broadcasters in the United States have been using similar language, at least some of the time.

 

So they're continuing to bomb the underground nuclear facility in Natanz. But I'm confused by this article from 2023:

An Iranian nuclear facility is so deep underground that US airstrikes likely couldn’t reach it

Unless you plan to continue bombing for all eternity, wouldn't there be a good chance you're just kicking hornet's nest?

 

“I have no doubt that your day of liberation from this tyranny is closer than ever. And when that day comes, Israelis and Iranians will renew the alliance between our two ancient peoples. Together, we will build a future of prosperity, a future of peace, a future of hope.”

That sounds familiar...

Trump pledges to ‘liberate’ LA as he visits troops at Fort Bragg

 

In final days of session, legislature advances Landry immigration agenda

SB15 criminalizes the failure of local officials – including sheriffs and other law enforcement officers – to cooperate with federal immigration agencies, with penalties of up to 10 years in prison.

Up to 10 years in prison if you refuse to blindly follow orders? Seems reasonable /s

It also criminalizes acts by everyday Louisiana residents deemed to obstruct or “thwart” federal immigration enforcement efforts. It passed 71-30.

"Thwart" immigration efforts seems like it could be very loosely interpreted to mean anything from intentionally or even unintentionally obstructing or delaying efforts, peacefully protesting or expressing dissent, potentially interpreted to punish immigration lawyers for doing their job.

Also, just pointing out the city of New Orleans was already on that DHS list of jurisdictions in violation of Trump's sanctuary policy

Feels like it would have been less passive aggressive to just @ the city within the actual text of the bill.

“The Orleans Parish Sheriff, who should be trying to get out from under the handcuffs of the consent decree, [is] using that as a shield to avoid the possible implications of refusing to cooperate with ICE,” Morris told committee members.

Also, love this argument (especially as we're watching riots in L.A. and the city of Glendale canceling it's own contract with ICE) bc it essentially seems to be saying take off those old handcuffs, and put on these new much more restrictive handcuffs.

 

SB15 criminalizes the failure of local officials – including sheriffs and other law enforcement officers – to cooperate with federal immigration agencies, with penalties of up to 10 years in prison.

Up to 10 years in prison if you refuse to blindly follow orders? Seems reasonable /s

It also criminalizes acts by everyday Louisiana residents deemed to obstruct or “thwart” federal immigration enforcement efforts. It passed 71-30.

"Thwart" immigration efforts seems like it could be very loosely interpreted to mean anything from intentionally or even unintentionally obstructing or delaying efforts, peacefully protesting or expressing dissent, potentially interpreted to punish immigration lawyers for doing their job.

Also, just pointing out the city of New Orleans was already on that DHS list of jurisdictions in violation of Trump's sanctuary policy

Feels like it would have been less passive aggressive to just @ the city within the actual text of the bill.

“The Orleans Parish Sheriff, who should be trying to get out from under the handcuffs of the consent decree, [is] using that as a shield to avoid the possible implications of refusing to cooperate with ICE,” Morris told committee members.

Also, love this argument (especially as we're watching riots in L.A. and the city of Glendale canceling it's own contract with ICE) bc it essentially seems to be saying take off those old handcuffs, and put on these new much more restrictive handcuffs.

Durr we luv smol gubmint and freedum 🖕

 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/66472753

It's been so crazy that I forgot all about the DHS list of jurisdictions in violation of the Trump administration's policy on sanctuary cities according to his EO released on April 28th. Apparently they published it last week and immediately took it back down.

When the EO was released, I figured my own city would be on the list, and it was, along with 36 other jurisdictions.

So can't say for sure, but it definitely has me a little nervous that all the jurisdictions on that list could soon be facing what we're seeing play out in California. The mayor said, she believes what is happening in L.A. is a test run, and I agree with her 100%

71
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/66472753

It's been so crazy that I forgot all about the DHS list of jurisdictions in violation of the Trump administration's policy on sanctuary cities according to his EO released on April 28th. Apparently they published it last week and immediately took it back down.

When the EO was released, I figured my own city would be on the list, and it was, along with 36 other ~~jurisdictions~~ states. There are hundreds of counties listed

So can't say for sure, but it definitely has me a little nervous that all the jurisdictions on that list could soon be facing what we're seeing play out in California. The mayor said, she believes what is happening in L.A. is a test run, and I agree with her 100%

view more: ‹ prev next ›