Aarkon

joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Aarkon@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I have my fermenter exposed to rather significant temperature deltas, so airlock activity maybe is not the best indicator in my case as the air inside expands and contracts. It would suffice of course just to measure daily with the refractometer to see if there still is activity. Not having to though is a tempting idea to me. 😄

[–] Aarkon@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

For everyone involved and/or curious: I took a regular hydrometer reading last evening, which gave me ~1.011/1.010. So while not too far off, that is still significantly lower than what the Pill sees. Also, when taking some more time to observe, I realized that there is indeed still airlock activity going on. Now that I was sure there was still CO2 being produced, I then peeked under the lid and saw that the Pill had collected quite some dried trub on its waterline. After seriously sanitizing everything, I took it out, cleaned it and pitched it back, though that didn't result in more realistic measurements. So I guess it's down to a calibration issue.
What a stupid situation: The only at least halfway reliable measuring instrument after fermentation start remains the saccharometer, which requires a sample of 100 - 200 ml for each measurement, so you can't do this every day for an elongated period of time without losing significant amounts of product for a batch if this size. Only alternative would be a transparent fermenter like the FermZilla and leave the saccharometer afloat the whole time. Not sure if I like that idea.

At least I got a taste sample this way and I'm happy to report that there is nothing weird going on. It's not the biggest beer in the world, but summer is coming anyway, so that's only a half bad thing. I'll report back with pictures in a few weeks after conditioning. Cheers!

@SpiderShoeCult@sopuli.xyz @plactagonic@sopuli.xyz @waldek@lemmy.86thumbs.net @drre@feddit.de

[–] Aarkon@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Forgot to mention my yeast, it's Fermentis S-04.

[–] Aarkon@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The temperature fluctuated from 20.2 to 17.7° C in 10 hours. I don't know, is that much? Doesn't look too bad for me, but I'm not yeast. :D

[–] Aarkon@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

I'll try agitating the beer a little to see if that sets anything free. It will sit in the bucket for at at least two more days anyway, so I'm not afraid of trub. If that doesn't help, I'll also take a look at the hydrometer, thanks for the suggestion.

[–] Aarkon@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've got a BrewZilla Gen 4 35L. I don't know what you'd consider low efficiency, but the unit's default profile in Brewfather is ~76%, whereas the software calculated roughly 65% efficiency for the batch in question. I've got no idea though how that compares to the Braumeister 20L other than the values in Brewfather are rather similar.
What was a first was crushing the grains myself, but mashing on itself went fine. Looking back, I might have wanted to check for starch with iodine, which I even had available. Might do next time. I also might want to add though that I used 13.5 liters of strike water and did what from my understanding is a batch sparge (raising & draining the mash tun, then adding hot water from a second vessel with a jug) with another 15 liters at 80° C. Not perfect for efficiency, I know, but as described my pre-boil gravity was fine. I must just have been to shy on the heat while boiling.

In the back of my head, I have the number of 10% boiloff being desirable, which would match with your 1 hour boil observation.

My last point is that I'm afraid the beer might be too thin as in too much liquid for too few sugars dissolved in it. I didn't boil off enough water, so I did not concentrate the wort far enough to reach the desired post boil gravity.

[–] Aarkon@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

Well, that or go to court for a movie collection. I'd phrase my statement differently, but I can see the appeal of the settlement.

[–] Aarkon@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

No pressure, just a plain plastic bucket. I'd be happy enough to know if my fermentation really stopped, it just seems way too early with just roughly one day of activity.

[–] Aarkon@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Airlock activity is so little that it might as well be expanding air (the bucket sits in my garage without extra heating or cooling, subject to the temperature cycles visible in the graph). There is nothing really in the bucket the hydrometer could be stuck against on my opinion, but I‘d have to open it to check - which I’m reluctant to do because of infection risk, obviously.

Taste testing I didn’t think of until now, good thinking. Will do tomorrow. If it’s completely dry, the calculations must be way off. If there is still sugar in it, I assume it's non-fermentable stuff. I always forget if that's maltose or dextrose.

[–] Aarkon@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Just to give an update on this: I bought the expensive posts as well as new lids from Ali Express. Now the kegs were way more expensive, but still a good deal I suppose.

[–] Aarkon@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

Thanks for pointing that out.

[–] Aarkon@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess this is probably the solution to my riddle. Thanks.

 

Hi all!

There is this song I play with my band which contains the following phrase: [^tune]

Or in ASCII, if you prefer:

e 5--5--|5--5--|7--7--|9--9--|
B -7--7-|-7--7-|-7--7-|-7--7-|
G --6--6|--6--6|--6--6|--6--6|
D ------|------|------|------|
A ------|------|------|------|
E ------|------|------|------|

The riff around that phrase wraps it four times with a little chord change at the end, and is itself played up to three times in a row, adding up to 12 repetitions of the above in one go. It's played on a mostly clean channel, so muting the ringing strings is not an issue. [^tempo]

It's arguably not the hardest thing in the world to pull off for some bars, but having to play it for way over a minute straight puts serious strain on my wrist. After some time, I involuntarily stiffen up, now moving the better part of my forearm rather than only my hand. That of course impedes my speed and precision even more, and in the next part, I'll be really exhausted - where I have to play a tight galloping rhythm, that I'm then often times unable to do well (enough).

What I'm looking for here is some advice on efficient technique, another picking pattern perhaps? I often times feel I practice the wrong thing. Until now, I tried u u u, which feels the most precise, but also tiring. It further makes me hit the highest string way harder than the others.
Currently, I practice d u u, which feels more ergonomic, but emphasizes the first note even more and becomes hard to control after a while.
Lately, I heard about "pick where you want to go next". That would be u u d in my case, which feels really odd. Are you folks familiar with that approach, is it worth the time investment or do you have other suggestions?

P.S.: I could get away with hybrid picking because even though it's also tiring for me doing it that fast for so long, it's tiring other parts of my arm/hand which are not tested by the following part again. But fingerpicking sounds really different than with a pick and that doesn't fit the song very well.

[^tune]: It's tuned down a whole step, but that doesn't matter too much here.

[^tempo]: A note on the tempo: Many metronomes, especially the in browser-variety, don't get 6/8 right in my opinion, so for this riff, setting a metronome to 4/4 at 120 bpm and playing the high notes on every beat is better

 

Hi!

Recently, I came across both EmuDeck and retroachievements.org. Playing a little Silent Hill and checking my achievements for the game at the website, I saw they only counted as "softcore", and reading up on the topic, I learned about something called "Hardcore Mode". In this mode, an emulator won't give you additional features of e.g. saving state etc., basically emulating the original experience as close as possible.
I'm by no means a completionist, but I wonder how this would feel like. I haven't found any related setting in EmuDeck so far though and my googling skills fail me here. Does any of you folks have a hint where to enable that?

 
 

Hi!

I know that there is SPC x to open the scratch buffer, but is there also a similar shortcut to quickly close/hide it again? Of course I can always CTRL x 0, but that feels clunky.

view more: ‹ prev next ›