Frankly, it would be bad precedent if he wasn't expelled.
this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
211 points (98.6% liked)
politics
25346 readers
2348 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It has already set a bad precedent because a) he didn't resign on his own after all what became public knowledge and b) that it took so long to get rid of him after is was clear that he had no honor left.
The best time to hold Republicans accountable was 60 years ago when they were trying to foment a race war and sabotaging US led peace talks in Vietnam to win a presidential election. The second best time is today.
Some might say “Expelling George Santos set a good precedent”
I am one of those people. He is a conman and a criminal, end of story. This isn't some political gray area here.
And those people clearly hate freedom and a free market /s
In theory, yes. In practice, he had to be everything Republicans hated for them to vote against him. I don't believe his lies or suspicious finances were the problems.
The true things about him that got his party to vote against him were: he's gay, he's brown, he's done drag, his Wikipedia page doesn't have a birth place.
I can think of about 50 Republicans and 1 Democrat that also need to be booted.
That ratio seems about right. Who is the Democrat?
I think you're about 200 Republicans and maybe a dozen Democratic lawmakers low
Quick edit; I'm thinking across both houses of Congress with this count
Only 50 and 1? I'm thinking quadruple the first number and make the second one what you made the first one. That should get rid of the most corrupt members of the House,.including the top leadership of both parties.
In the Senate I'm thinking 40 of one, 20 of the other.
White House: most cabinet positions, president and vice president are too corrupt and/or incompetent so replace those.
Lauren McFerran can definitely stay. She's doing magnificent work at the NLRB. Probably the best the agency has been doing in my 40 year lifetime.
I'd like to see more expelled. Starting with those that signed on for OJ's (Orange Jesus) coup.
Also, is there any chance that Santos goes to prison?
Probably, he went after rich people's money for his own gain, not their's or the party's goal.
Does he get any retirement benfits or not
He didn't do 5 years, so most likely not. And if the new bill about expelled representatives goes through, it will we upgraded to no.
Only republicans think that removing a cancerous tumor is a bad thing.
Yes it did! Now I can't STEAL MONEY from my Constituents!
It can be both. Very specifically, expelling someone who hasn't been convicted of anything is bad precedent. But it's also necessary when the crimes are this obvious, this tied in to his job as congressman, and the legal system moves as slow as it does.
expelling someone who hasn't been convicted of anything is bad precedent
In most cases, I would agree with this. In the case of Santos, I do not. He ran his campaign claiming to be several things he is not. When that information was discovered, I think that would be enough to throw him out. At the point of knowing his entire persona was lies, he was not the person the people elected.
Crimes aside, his open & admitted lies alone should have been enough to expel him.
Yes, but that would require republicans to come up with impossible things, like integrity.
I want him gone too, but saying the impact has been minimal a week after his expulsion seems a little myopic.
I acknowledge George Santos as rightful president of the united states.