this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
12 points (92.9% liked)

USA

1 readers
1 users here now

News and Stories of the USA

founded 2 years ago
 

Some members of the committee said such a ban, proposed two months after a prominent conservative activist was caught meeting with a famous white supremacist, might be a “slippery slope” or too vague.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

we know they don't hang out with librarians

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

“Slippery slope” indeed. What’s next, ethics? Accountability? Personal responsibility? WHERE WILL THIS MADNESS END?!?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thats a clear violation of the first amendment, freedom of association. Am I misreading the article?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

First amendment doesn't apply to rules private political affiliations insist upon for their members.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

OOOOH On second read that's incredibly obvious. I thought someone proposed a bill or something. That makes much more sense.