this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
30 points (100.0% liked)

food

22640 readers
18 users here now

Welcome to c/food!

The place for all kinds of food discussion: from photos of dishes you've made to recipes or even advice on how to eat healthier.

Animal liberation is essential to any leftist movement.

Image posts containing animal products must have nfsw tag and add a content warning (CW:Meat/Cheese/Egg) ,and try to post recipes easily adaptable for vegan.

Posts that contain animal products may receive informative comments regarding animal liberation, and users may disengage by telling a commenter that the original poster wants to, "disengage".

Off-topic, Toxic, inflammatory, aggressive debating, and meta (community rules, site rules, moderators,etc ) posts or comments will be removed.

Compiled state-by-state resource for homeless shelters, soup kitchens, food pantries, and food banks.

Food Not Bombs Recipes

The People's Cookbook

Bread recipes

Please be sure to read the Code of Conduct and remember we are all comrades here. Share all your delicious food secrets.

Ingredients of the week: Mushrooms,Cranberries, Brassica, Beetroot, Potatoes, Cabbage, Carrots, Nutritional Yeast, Miso, Buckwheat

Cuisine of the month:

Thai , Peruvian

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Made some pumpkin muffins and realized how in a lot of my cooking, I don't care too much about uniformity or presentation.

I'm pretty functional about it - like the meal and my previous creations speak for themselves. If I'm making something for a party or whatever, I try to make things look a little better, but I 100% prioritize flavor and texture more than anything else.

Other people who cook/bake, what are your thoughts on visual presentation?

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

aesthetics can be a force multiplier for taste and flavor

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

Somewhere between "not at all" and "very little." Like I'll avoid using sumac in curry if I'm making it for anyone else because it's also a strong purple dye that turns the otherwise yellow/orange curry a dull grey as a result, but other than that I don't give a single thought to how anything looks.

Sometimes something will come out looking quite aesthetic, though, like when I tossed red cabbage I'd pickled with tien tsin peppers on top of a bowl of egg-drop ramen with fried tofu, which looked almost professional for a meal that came out to less than a dollar to make - the contrast between the vibrant purple cabbage, the warm orange broth, and the crispy brown tofu was quite striking. Then I stirred it all together to actually eat it and the effect was lost completely.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

100% sure, but it's definitely tastier if it looks tasty

It's not always necessary, and there are diminishing returns, but it does bring your food to the next level, especially if you're entertaining guests

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The diminishing returns thing is my rule of thumb. Doesn't need to be fancy, just needs to not look like you slopped it out of a can.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I had some refried beans literally still in the shape of a can twice this week lol

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

Making for myself? Idfc. For others? Putting the rat under my chef hat

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

my grandpa would make the ugliest, most delicious food ever, and if you asked why it looks like that?

"it'll make a turd"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

"shit on a stick" was the common response to "what's for dinner" as a kid

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

I’m so bad for presentation. I prioritize flavor and texture or practicing a technique, I never even think about what it looks like. Sometimes good technique lends itself to aesthetic, like getting a great crust on a steak or doing an egg wash on a loaf of bread, but a lot of the time I don’t think at all about the visual. The food doesn’t suffer, but yeah, once in a while I’d love to put down a meal that people want to post on instagram.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

I wouldn't sacrifice flavor for aesthetics but I try to make things look as nice as I can. Why not?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If it looks good that’s just a bonus but as soon as I cook my food it’s assembled on the plate with each item separate from each other but I don’t go out of my way to make any of it look nice. If I was cooking for other people I might put some effort in just to make people feel good

But like yeah I would still devour those muffins idc how they look they still look good to me

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I made this tonight, when I'm proud of how it tastes I try harder to make it look appetizing

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

that looks really interesting! what is it?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I try to make it look good for other people, unless I'm really tired. Aesthetics is a big part of taste after all.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Zero

I respect the aesthetics and all but I cook stuff for it to taste good and be healthy. Sometimes it looks good too, but I'm putting zero effort into that part.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

A little bit of effort goes a long way. I obviously skip overt decoration for weeknight meals for myself, but like for a pie? That shit is going to look fancy, I'm imprinting the crust with a fork, I'm weaving the dough strips up top for a checkerboard look, I'm sprinkling some extra large sugar granules up top. I'm using warm plates and I'm putting a little effort into plating the entree and any sides, not letting them touch if possible.